My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/17/2001 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2001
>
12/17/2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:24:27 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 9:21:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/17/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DECEMBER 17, 2001 <br />City Planner Smyser indicated that the wording of his report is not identical to the Resolution <br />language. He indicated that Section 3(E) of the Resolution specifies what the moratorium does not <br />apply to. Paragraph 4 of that Section states that the moratorium would not apply to applications for <br />preliminary plats for commercial, industrial, or other non-residential development. <br />Councilmember Reinert noted that the City Council has discussed this topic in a few short meetings. <br />He stated that at first he wondered if the intent of the City could be accomplished without a <br />moratorium. He stated that after learning more about the reasons why a moratorium would be needed <br />and the possible legal ramifications of not having a moratorium whil- working on the ordinances, he <br />has come to understand the reasons for needing one. However, he n. _ that staff has indicated there <br />are a total of 143 different issues that need to be discussed and addres this topic and at this <br />point he does not know what these issues are. He felt that without t info .n he would be <br />voting in the dark and he wondered if all 143 issues needed to be inc d ons, e list. He questioned <br />whether some of the issues could be dealt with outside the mor <br />Councilmember Reinert was not certain whether he shoul vo e th "ssue this evening. He <br />acknowledged that at some point the City will need a moraome amount of time to update <br />its ordinances. However, he would prefer to know m ' abo the 143 topics before voting on the <br />moratorium. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated he was primarily <br />He felt that the process will determine whet <br />he was not convinced that the process has <br />before the process is established is putting <br />Councilmember Reinert noted the <br />ordinances that will allow the City to <br />moratorium is not intended to opftto <br />with the tools to control go in the <br />about the process that would be followed. <br />ssue is handled smoothly and at this point <br />He felt that establishing a moratorium <br />before the horse. <br />Councilmember R <br />issue tonight. He fe <br />City's codes prior to a <br />premature since the Co <br />process. <br />oratorium was to allow City staff to develop <br />e goals of the comprehensive plan. He indicated the <br />growth. Rather, the moratorium will provide the City <br />had thought long and hard on whether he could vote on this <br />eded to be put into establishing the process of updating the <br />ng a moratorium. He felt that voting on this issue this evening would be <br />it has not considered everything that needs to be considered to begin the <br />Councilmember Reinert stated that he intended to vote for the proposed moratorium at some point but <br />he would like more information in order to ensure that the work will be completed within one year so <br />the moratorium will not need to be extended. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to table consideration of the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 23- <br />01 to the January 14, 2002 City Council meeting. <br />10 <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.