Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2002 <br />submitted to the City for review prior to the effective date of the moratorium. Councilmember <br />Reinert seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Reinert questioned how many plats this amendment would affect. Community <br />Development Director Grochala stated this would depend upon the proposed cut-off date for plat <br />application submittals. Councilmember O'Donnell indicated his intent was for the cut-off date to be <br />the effective date of the moratorium. He acknowledged this could open the City to receiving more <br />plat applications before the effective date and suggested that this date be discussed and amended if <br />necessary. <br />Mayor Bergeson suggested the cut-off date be the date of adoption of the second reading of the <br />ordinance by the Council. <br />Councilmember Reinert agreed since his intent was to allow o <br />been submitted to be exempted from the moratorium. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to amend the proposed ame <br />proposed under Section 3E(1) of the ordinance be limited t <br />City prior to adoption of the second reading of the ordin <br />O'Donnell seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Carlson requested a legal opinio <br />challenges from other parties to this motion. Ci <br />the right to allow the moratorium to apply to <br />He stated providing the Council chooses <br />another, such as the effective date of the <br />would be defensible. <br />ose applications that have already <br />viding that the exemption <br />reliminary plats submitted to the <br />Council. Councilmember <br />ff's opinion on whether there would be <br />ey Hawkins indicated the City Council has <br />hing that has not received preliminary plat approval. <br />oes not specifically benefit one person over <br />of the ordinances as proposed, he believed this <br />Community Development Director - ._ a expressed concern for the developers that this exemption <br />would apply to. He noted ee onsistency in how the City approves or denies plats, <br />indicating that some plats ha =ane ou_ quickly while others have taken as long as one, two or <br />even three years. He was conc ed that the developers that the exemption would apply to would be <br />caught between existing ordinan -s and meeting those requirements, as well as perhaps being forced <br />or requested to meet ordinance requirements the City may or may not have developed. He noted there <br />would be no guarantee that if the plats meet all the current requirements, the City will approve the <br />plats since there are impending changes to some of the requirements. <br />Community Development Director Grochala noted there was a concern regarding the perception of a <br />moratorium and he personally felt if the situation he just proposed happens, which he was nearly <br />certain will happen, the impact on the perception would be much worse than simply moving forward <br />with the moratorium as originally proposed. <br />Councilmember Reinert noted the motion did not guarantee approval of the preliminary plats. <br />Community Development Director Grochala was concerned that the developers would move forward <br />anticipating that their plats will be considered for approval under the current zoning and subdivision <br />15 <br />