My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/14/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
01/14/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:23:47 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 9:32:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
01/14/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2002 <br />Councilmember Dahl stated she would be willing to vote in favor of the amended ordinance if <br />phasing requirements were included. Councilmember Carlson noted both developers in attendance <br />this evening have agreed to the phasing of their developments. <br />City Attorney Hawkins noted Mr. Coyle has asked that 25 acres of the Uhde development be <br />exempted from the moratorium and that the rest would be subject to the new regulations. He stated <br />he would prefer the ordinance be amended to allow plats of up to 25 acres submitted by the <br />established deadline to be exempted from the moratorium and the rest of the applications be <br />withdrawn. He stated if the Council were to simply require the remainder of the applications to <br />comply with the new regulations he was not certain this would be legally enforceable. <br />Mayor Bergeson expressed concern for requiring the developers to withdraw their applications and <br />reapply with a different number of acres. He noted if the amen- ordinance was approved this <br />evening, this would not allow this opportunity. City Attorney Hams indicated the developers <br />could amend their plats without being required to submit new aplicat s. <br />Community Development Director Grochala suggested the qvitiric b allow either the complete <br />applications to move forward as submitted or not allow any p r $` s of the applications to move <br />forward. He felt there would be problems with amen tithe applications since he prefers sites to be <br />master planned versus piece-mealed together. <br />Community Development Director Grochala net <br />residential developments per year would appl. <br />not in effect yet. He questioned, if the Co. <br />acres, would those acres apply to that g <br />want to be back before the Council i <br />due to some issue that was not cl <br />as an issue of how the goal of 147 <br />these developments if the Comprehensive Plan is <br />ed the developers to move forward with 25 <br />it these issues must be clarified and he would not <br />ee months recommending denial of the applications <br />Councilmember Carlson no <br />received as of the adoption o <br />Grochala stated if the Council <br />applications stand as submitted. <br />approved to amend the ordinance allowing the plats <br />anc to move forward. Community Development Director <br />roves the ordinance as amended, he would recommend that the <br />Councilmember Carlson noted the new Comprehensive Plan discusses phasing large developments <br />and the plats that would be covered by the amended ordinance include a total of 288 units. She <br />believed the Council and the developers were in agreement with the phasing of those developments <br />and asked how this can be accomplished for this year. <br />Mayor Bergeson suggested that the new exemption in the ordinance be amended to limit the number <br />of units or acres that can be developed in one year under that exemption. <br />Mr. Coyle stated the preliminary plat submitted last Wednesday included a five phase process, which <br />would begin with the requested 25 acres. He suggested that Mr. Weiland make this same type of <br />commitment as well. <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.