Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 14, 2002 <br />those developments and, although the new regulations may be better, he did not have problems with <br />the quality of the developments that have been approved. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell stated he understood staff's concerns, but he supported Mayor Bergeson's <br />comments. He did not feel the amendment changed the spirit of the moratorium ordinance or the <br />direction to staff to complete the new ordinances. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated he has the utmost confidence in the ability of City staff to review the <br />plats and forward them correctly to the Council. He noted both applicants have agreed to the phasing <br />of the developments. <br />Councilmember Dahl requested a clarification of the proposed phasing. She noted Mr. Coyle had <br />offered to begin with 25 acres, which would be one-third of the originally proposed development. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated phasing requirements had not been inclu <br />rather the developers have verbally agreed to the phasing of the <br />Mr. Weiland anticipated his development would be phased <br />him to determine the exact amount of acreage involved i <br />best to master plan this type of development and he wi <br />most sense. <br />The Council clarified that the motion now on <br />Ordinance No. 23-01, calling for a moratori <br />language as proposed by Councilmember <br />enumerated under Section 3E(1) of the <br />been submitted to the City for review <br />the City Council, to proceed forw <br />the ordinance amendment, <br />q ments. <br />tages, although it was difficult for <br />se at this time. He agreed that it is <br />to determine which stages will make the <br />s for the adoption of the second reading of <br />new residential development, with the amended <br />providing for an addition to the exemptions <br />e, which would allow preliminary plats which had <br />ption of second reading of Ordinance No. 23-01 by <br />s until the plats were either approved or denied. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated he h ; : an 's opinion since the last City Council meeting and he <br />intended to vote against the p ora`torium ordinance. He believed the moratorium would send <br />the wrong message to the busin s community that the City is shutting down for business and he <br />preferred to encourage business. <br />Mayor Bergeson added he heard the legal arguments but believed the Council has the right to <br />implement a moratorium. However, in this case he believed the rules before the moratorium and after <br />the moratorium will be significantly different and this makes it more difficult to defend having a <br />moratorium. He felt the changes will be much more substantial than those made during most <br />moratoriums. <br />Councilmember Carlson commented that the current Council has significant differences in views and <br />she felt all the Councilmembers respect each other's views and attempt to reach a consensus. She felt <br />this was evident tonight with the agreement the Council came to regarding the proposed moratorium <br />ordinance. She acknowledged that the decisions made this evening will cause some concerns for City <br />staff but she was pleased the Council was able to reach an agreement and move forward. <br />21 <br />