Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 25, 2002 <br />reason the City has a second reading was to allow the Councilmembers to give more thought to an <br />issue prior to making a final decision on an ordinance. <br />Mayor Bergeson called for a motion on the SECOND reading of Ordinance No. 03-02. He reviewed <br />the motion and the location of the no -wake zone as approved during the last City Council meeting. <br />Councilmember Carlson stated she had initiated the motion during the last City Council meeting to <br />adopt the ordinance, however, she had voted against the motion to amend the motion and include a <br />sunset clause. She did not believe she could make a motion at this time since she would not want to <br />include a sunset clause and she had not been on the prevailing side when this clause was added to the <br />ordinance. <br />It was City Attorney Hawkins' opinion that because final action has not been taken, Councilmember <br />Carlson could make a motion this evening on the second reading the ordinance. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the SECOND readin <br />surface use of motorized watercraft on Peltier Lake in the P <br />wake zone as previously approved and a sunset date of Sept <br />O'Donnell seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell felt the purpose of incl <br />the issue is reviewed and that a report with reco <br />improvements to the lake. <br />Councilmember Carlson expressed conce <br />She noted the Centerville City Council <br />received by the City today, Anoka C <br />review period was inadequate. Sh <br />the majority of the Council did not <br />nance 03-02, Regulating the <br />sland area, to include a no- <br />, 2004. Councilmember <br />as set date in the ordinance was to ensure <br />ons is made regarding the progress of the <br />ng together with other governmental bodies. <br />pport a sunset clause. Additionally, per an e-mail <br />of support a sunset clause and feels that a two year <br />aft copies of the Centerville City Council meeting, <br />a sunset clause. <br />Regarding the issue of eagles ' ti _'theeron rookery, Councilmember Carlson indicated Joan <br />Galli has studied this issue for 'z1 years and has found both eagles and herons nesting and coexisting <br />at Peltier Lake. She indicated thnotion of the birds feeding at Trout Air is not their usual way to <br />feed and noted there are fish in Peltier Lake for the young herons to feed upon. <br />Regarding the buffer distance of a no -wake zone, Councilmember Carlson noted the staff report states <br />the purpose of the no -wake zoned is to minimize human disturbance to adjacent nesting birds, aquatic <br />vegetation and water quality around the island. The need for buffer areas around nesting birds is well <br />documented. Research indicates the need for at least a 300 -meter nesting and buffer zone for great <br />blue heron nests, and that the birds tend to abandon nests when larger disturbances occur within 500 <br />meters. The effects of intensive motorized watercraft use in shallow lake areas is also well <br />documented. <br />Councilmember Carlson expressed two concerns for the ordinance as proposed. One concern was for <br />safety and she noted the Chief of Police and other property owners along the northeast end of the lake <br />10 <br />