My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/03/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
04/03/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:20:01 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 10:34:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
04/03/2002
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 3, 2002 <br />Councilmember O'Donnell inquired about the variance request for the garage. <br />Mr. Joyer stated the garage was built in 1975. The setback for the garage was met at that <br />time. He stated that Mr. and Mrs. Thorp did not ask the County to combine the lots. He <br />further stated they were unaware that the lots were combined. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated the new garage with the existing <br />garage would exceed the accessory structure requirements. <br />Mr. Joyer stated Mr. and Mrs. Thorp were allowed to sell Lot 30 four years ago. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated the City Clerk at that time certified <br />the deed in 1998. That should not have happened and the cil did not approve it. <br />Mr. Joyer stated the sale of this lot is part of the Thorp's longi - irement plan. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated the <br />go through the City process that will also include a v <br />make Findings of Fact to support the request. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell inquired about th <br />Development Director Grochala stated this <br />clause because the lots were at some poi <br />proof that they did not want the lots c <br />ion request would have to <br />uest. The City needs to <br />ther clause. Community <br />excluded from the grandfather <br />biped. The applicant needs to demonstrate <br />Acting Mayor Reinert stated he i _. the subdivision request because they will be <br />using the lots as they were inte d. e':er issue is the variance request. <br />Councilmember O'Do ^ - d Id support the subdivision request but needs <br />more information on the <br />Councilmember Carlson stat she is going to visit the area. She stated she is undecided <br />but is hearing solid reasons from staff why the subdivision request should not be <br />approved. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated she is also undecided. The County has to have something to <br />back up their claim that the property owner did request that the lots be combined. <br />Acting Mayor Reinert stated the subdivision is not a big issue because it fits in with the <br />area. The garage is the issue. Both requests need to go through the City process. <br />DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT ALONG LAKE DRIVE, MARY ALICE <br />DIVINE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.