My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/05/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
06/05/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:18:20 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 11:31:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
06/05/2002
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JUNE 5, 2002 <br />Mr. Dave Hunter, Representative for the Air Park Board, stated the Board has an issue <br />with Option 2. Neighbors will be complaining about the Air Park noise and a buffer is <br />needed. There is also the ration of the runway in relation to Safety Zone A that needs to <br />be considered when the houses are built. Some lots may be pushed into the safety zone. <br />He stated the Board has worked with Mr. Uhde to come up with other options for a larger <br />buffer. He noted that as a citizen he would prefer the collector street be developed more <br />to the north due to the traffic distribution. <br />Council directed staff to look into the issues relating to Safety Zone A. <br />City Planner Smyser stated there is no difference between Option 2 and Option 4 in <br />relation to the homes being too close to runways. The Air Park will however, prefer that <br />the lots are sold to Air Park people. The rules of the Air Park are in private covenants. <br />The City does have zoning designations that could refer to it Park. <br />City Planner Smyser added that the staff concern with Optio 4 is = temporary <br />connection, traffic issues and adequate accesses. <br />Mr. Jeff Kolstead, homeowner in the area, stated he it oed about the road going <br />along his house at the end of the cul-de-sac. He s + makes sense to move Carl Street <br />further north. He stated he build his house in 1 ' + an+ p `. ced where the City indicated it <br />had to be placed. If the road went through it ,foul+ o approximately 15 feet from his <br />house. It will decrease his property value . + e wetland and drainage issues. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated it mak e` `move the street north if it is possible. It <br />could happen if the developer gets c erat +n from the property owner to the northeast. <br />Mr. Uhde suggested he deed th t=+ ay so the permanent connection could be <br />made at any time. <br />Councilmember Carlson ung +'nly part of the road just pushes the problem into <br />the future. <br />Mr. Uhde stated he will construct the roadway anywhere the City wants him to. Direction <br />from the Council is needed. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated the City has things in place to easier <br />pursue Option. Option 2 allows the City to make the connections. He suggested a <br />combination of Option 2 and Options 2 constructing the roadway north of the water <br />channel with Carl Street going through. <br />Council directed staff to further investigate the possibility of a variation of Option 2 and <br />Option 4. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.