My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/10/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
06/10/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:18:06 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 11:38:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
06/10/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 10, 2002 <br />examine the proposed Five -Year Financial Plan in more detail. As a result, City staff was not <br />prepared to continue the public hearing this evening. <br />City Administrator Waite Smith advised City staff recommends continuing the public hearing on the <br />Five -Year Financial Plan to the Monday, July 8, 2002 regular City Council meeting. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to continue the public hearing on the Five -Year Financial Plan for <br />2002 through 2006 to the Monday, July 8, 2002 regular City Council meeting. Councilmember Dahl <br />seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH <br />Consideration of Resolution No. 02-52, Amending 2002 Fee S , le — Ann Blair, City Clerk <br />Blair advised, with the passage of Lino Lakes Ordinance No. 06-1:12 d g the May 28, 2002 City <br />Council meeting, relating to the Sale, Use and Possession of '+ the City Council has <br />considered appropriate fees to be charged and reached a co ensu as to the amount. The proposed <br />new fees have been inserted into the 2002 Fee Schedule de e Regulations." The new fees are <br />underlined. <br />City Clerk Blair advised staff has requested one o <br />two, under "Building -Construction Utilities", t <br />to reflect a change that had not been identifie <br />Metropolitan Council determines this fee. <br />or change to the Fee Schedule. On page <br />arge is proposed to be amended to $1,200.00 <br />en the Schedule was adopted in January. The <br />age is also underlined. <br />City Clerk Blair advised staff reco s : + tion of Resolution No. 02-52, Amending the 2002 <br />Fee Schedule. <br />Councilmember Carlson qu + + w e®q, he portion of the Fee Schedule regarding fireworks <br />should be entitled "Fireworks ' ons , versus "Fire Regulations." City Clerk Blair indicated the <br />new ordinance regulating firew ® ks was added to the City Code under the general heading of Fire <br />Regulations since there was no s ecific section addressing fireworks in the past. However, she <br />offered to amend the Fee Schedule as suggested. <br />Councilmember Carlson indicated the reason she mentioned this concern was because she felt this <br />category was related to burning permits. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 02-52, Amending the 2002 Fee Schedule. <br />Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 02-52 can be found in the City Clerk's office. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.