Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 9, 2002 <br />Mayor Bergeson questioned Councilmember Carlson if this had been the intent of her motion. <br />Councilmember Carlson stated this had been her intent, although she had not specified the date. She <br />stated she would prefer to obtain additional information from Anoka County regarding whether the <br />funds are still available for this project and whether the County was willing to accept the plans <br />proposed in the City's July 2002 letter to the County. <br />Councilmember Carlson clarified her motion to table consideration of Resolution No. 02-95 to the <br />Monday, September 23, 2002 regular City Council meeting. As seconder of the original motion, <br />Councilmember Dahl supported this clarification. <br />Councilmember Carlson noted during the Council work session the City Council had indicated what <br />information they want from Anoka County and she did not feel the motion to table needed to be <br />amended to include this request. <br />Mayor Bergeson questioned City staff whether they were clear on what information is being <br />requested from Anoka County. Community Development Director Grochala responded affirmatively. <br />Mayor Bergeson noted there had been a discussion on the possibility of the southern portion of the <br />roadway being constructed to a four -lane width but being striped for only three lanes at this time. He <br />questioned whether this would be possible. <br />Community Development Director Grochala indicated the proposed plans did include the build -out of <br />• the roadway south of Birch Street to a four lane width but with the roadway being striped with two <br />lanes and a middle turn lane. <br />Mayor Bergeson noted this was not a public hearing but offered to take brief public comments at this <br />time. <br />Robert Benning indicated he has attended many meetings regarding this issue over the past two years. <br />He stated, although he does not live along Highway 49, he uses this highway every day. He felt that <br />there has been give and take on both sides and he could not see what the City would gain by delaying <br />this decision two more weeks. He felt all the information has been provided. He noted during the <br />Council work session he had heard concern that voting on this project could affect the primary <br />elections. He hoped that this project would not be delayed. <br />Regarding the outcome of the project for Highway 49, Mr. Benning noted all people must live with <br />the decisions they make on where they choose to live. He indicated that when he moved to the <br />community he chose not to live on Highway 49 because it was a County highway. He stated no one <br />forced the current residents to purchase their houses on Highway 49 and all those residents were <br />aware that Highway 49 was a County highway. <br />Lynn Heaser questioned what the City Council was being asked to vote on this evening. She <br />indicated she had not been informed about the discussions during the recent Council work session and <br />questioned whether the proposal under consideration was what the residents wanted. <br />• Mayor Bergeson stated the action under consideration this evening was to pass a Resolution that <br />would follow-up the letter sent by the City to Anoka County in July 2002. He indicated there has <br />8 <br />