My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/23/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
09/23/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 2:41:00 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 2:08:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
09/23/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 23, 2002 <br />would cut through the old farmhouse. He noted that similar requests were approved last month and <br />last year. Mr. Lindahl stated because of those prior approvals, this application will not create a <br />precedence situation. <br />Mr. Lindahl noted there are currently grave sites in the right-of-way. He stated his son will be using <br />the lot for a future home so they are very flexible in the lot layout. <br />Councilmember Reinert asked if wetlands go all the way out to County Road J. Mr. Lindahl stated <br />that is correct. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated his impression that the requirement for road frontage allows for the <br />construction of a building and to provide access. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated in this situation, requiring the 330 foot <br />request to divide a one acre lot for a homestead, which is more s <br />Bergeson noted it is usually desirable to place the more narrow 1 <br />there appears to be an inconsistency and it is possible that ma <br />regulations. However, it is now the current requirement. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated the point of requiring eq t is to provide access and use of the land. <br />In this situation, it splits off one acre for a home us <br />1 dimension does not apply to this <br />to an urban lot. Mayor <br />sion on the street. He stated <br />ged in a future zoning <br />Mr. Lindahl reviewed the surrounding land us <br />to the wetlands. He doubted there will ever <br />Community Development Director Gro <br />this subdivision is 155' x 281'. Mr. <br />Community Development Director <br />extends into that lot for Co <br />less than one acre. Commumi J'eve <br />nonconformity exists with the `. size. <br />e mostly open and will remain that way due <br />ilities extended into this area or further development. <br />ed it appears the one acre lot size proposed as part of <br />ed according to the surveyor that is one acre. <br />a noted there is an existing 33 feet of right-of-way that <br />you subtract that from the proposed lot size, it would be <br />pm -nt Director Grochala stated this means that a second <br />Mr. Lindahl stated that is the official legal dimensions of the lot. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated this original parcel was purposely designed to be eleven acres to conform with <br />the City's regulation and he does not think there was issue with the right-of-way at that point when <br />the previous subdivision was considered. He stated it was the assumption at that time that it would be <br />divided to a 10 and 1. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated if an exception was made then you would have to look at this as a <br />conforming property. <br />Community Development Director Grochala presented a diagram of the parcel and identified the <br />boundaries and proposed subdivision. He explained that Tract B, a one -acre lot, is 155' x which <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.