Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 14, 2002 <br />• further subdivision of the property. The total fee under this scenario, to be charge at this time, is <br />$3,968.50. However, the Nadeau's do not qualify for this exception under the existing policy. <br />• <br />• <br />Rather than grant an exemption to the existing policy, staff is recommending the amendment of the <br />policy to address both developed and undeveloped large lots adjacent to trunk sewer and water mains. <br />The policy amendment would provide for the following: <br />1. All lots that cannot be subdivided would be charged based on the minimum requirements of <br />the zoning district the mains were intended to serve, upon connection to the mains. <br />2. All lots that can be further subdivided would be charged based on the minimum requirements <br />of the zoning district the mains were intended to serve, upon connection to the mains. The <br />remainder of the assessment will be deferred until further subdivision of the property. <br />Staff has also included a provision that, in the event a parcel is <br />assessment clause would apply. <br />divided in the future, the applicable <br />Community Development Director Grochala advised staff reom <br />02-149. <br />ends approval of Resolution No. <br />Councilmember Carlson stated the assessment fee was originally over $90,000. Under the previous <br />policy the fee was $40,000. She asked what the fee will be according to the new policy. <br />Community Development Director Grochala state the original fee of $95,000 included surface water <br />management fees. Staff determined t hat fee eidW of apply so the fee was calculated at approximately <br />$40,000. The total fee will be $3,968.50 under tnerevised policy. The property owner will also be <br />responsible for the actual connection fees to the main. <br />Councilmember Carlson asked what the assessment fees will be in the future in the property is <br />subdivided. Community Development Director Grochala stated that will depend on what happens in <br />the area. The property will not be subdivided because it is not 10 acres. The estimated amount of <br />assessment fees for the entire' property will be approximately $40,000 minus the Nadeau fee of <br />$3968.50. <br />Councilmember Carlson stated that with the policy amendment that leaves approximately $37,000 to <br />be assessed on the property. She asked if the City charges interest or improvement costs at the time of <br />the improvement because it sounds like the property owner is getting an interest fee loan. <br />Community Development Director Grochala reviewed the City policy regarding unit charges. The <br />unit charges are based on fixed numbers that the City approved many years ago. Those numbers are <br />based on an index that is reviewed yearly and has inflation built into it. <br />Councilmember Carlson clarified that the assessment for the property will then be more if the <br />property is subdivided in the future. She stated the amendment would apply to others in the same <br />situation. She stated there was a resident on Birch Street in the same situation with an existing home. <br />She asked if the amendment will work better for individuals on large lots. <br />26 <br />