My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/28/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
10/28/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 1:56:54 PM
Creation date
2/6/2015 8:46:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/28/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />OCTOBER 28, 2002 <br />• Planner Gretz stated that is a building department matter but she believes it could be done in some <br />fashion. <br />• <br />Councilmember Dahl stated when discussed in the past, she thought the conclusion was that the metal <br />building was by far cheaper to build than if with siding and a regular roof. She asked if that was true <br />in this case also. Planning Associate Gretz stated that she has no information on the cost. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated while that may be true, the City ordinance only addresses construction and not <br />the cost. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated that a variance has been requested because he cannot comply with what <br />is required in the ordinance. She stated she thought the variance process helped citizens out of a tight <br />situation and that is why they were sometimes granted. <br />Mayor Bergeson asked if metal siding is prohibited and if metal r'oofing.s also prohibited. <br />Associate Planner Gretz stated it is prohibited in this zoning district: <br />Jamie Brown, applicant, stated the existing building is 24'''t24' and was constructed to replace a <br />dilapidated 12' by 12' shed with 6 feet of awning around it He stated he was willing to take down <br />that dilapidated shed when this new one was constrtt. He stated he thinks it looks better now than <br />it did before and asked if he could take the tin down and put up plywood and barn wood. Mr. Brown <br />stated the idea was to improve the property, not love tax value. He stated he thinks his property <br />looks better than Oakdale does where there are houses sitting 50 feet from each other. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated the City is reviewing ordinances and asked if consideration is being <br />ln <br />given, in the future, to reconsider theaterials used on pole barns or sheds. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated accessory buildings have been discussed although <br />the material types are not proposed to be changed since there has not been an issue with that <br />requirement up to this point. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated she remembers a past variance to allow a metal building when that <br />gentleman proved it was far cheaper to use metal. <br />Councilmember Reinert asked what the outcome would be if this request is denied. <br />Associate Planner Gretz stated if it is denied the issue would go back to the City Attorney for <br />prosecution. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked what the recommendation would be. <br />Associate Planner Gretz stated the City would look for the building to be taken down or brought into <br />compliance with the City Code. <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.