Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 13, 2003 <br />APPROVED <br />the City Attorney to include the language needed to justify the exception of "The Village." A copy of <br />the ordinance showing the changes can be considered at the next meeting. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated this is good discussion and areas of concern need to be raised now so staff can <br />begin work on them. <br />Councilmember Carlson stated concern that the goal be defensible, especially if exceptions are added. <br />She asked if that would not make it more difficult to defend. She noted this is not in the <br />Comprehensive Plan and another option is to spread the units over the life of the Comprehensive Plan <br />but not go beyond the 7,575 housing units. Councilmember Carlson stated she realizes the pressure <br />the City is under for more growth and that the City may need to look at that. She noted this Growth <br />Management Plan is to be reviewed on an annual basis but if it goes into effect it needs to be done <br />based on what is included in the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Councilmember Reinert suggested that the additional language be included prior to consideration of <br />second reading. He noted that including the units but staying with the 7,575 housing units would be <br />reducing the 147 to below 120 a year. <br />Mayor Bergeson noted that staff has talked about establishing criteria and someone else may say they <br />have a worthwhile project that promotes the community and other things but since it is not <br />specifically laid out, it would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment and he thinks it would also <br />require a review of the 7,575 housing units. So, if there is a big project that has equal merits to this, <br />there are still a lot of things that would have to happen before it can be approved. In addition, there is <br />no right on the part of the developer to have the City amend the Comprehensive Plan and change goal <br />numbers. The Council would have to feel it was in the best interest of the City to change the <br />Comprehensive Plan. So even if it is theoretically possible, the developer does not have the right to <br />demand multiple Comprehensive Plan amendments to accommodate a project. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated the best approach is to get more specific language from the City <br />Attorney, discuss it at length at the next work session, and try to include the right words to make "The <br />Village" unique enough so the City is not faced with someone else wanting to duplicate the same <br />scenario of a project. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to approve FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 01-03, Ordinance <br />Creating a Growth Management Policy. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Carlson stated she will vote against the motion tonight but may vote in support of it <br />in two weeks. She stated she wants to know that it is legal and that exceeding the 7,575 housing units <br />does not place the City in an indefensible position She stated this is a unique project; however, there <br />are other areas in the City where mixed use and high density are being considered and there is a 362.5 <br />acre site on the east side where a developer is working on a proposal that was presented at a past work <br />session. Councilmember Carlson stated the City has to be very careful and until she sees language <br />saying it is legal and can be defended, she is uncomfortable with voting yes this evening. <br />17 <br />