Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 13, 2003 <br />APPROVED <br />Councilmember Carlson stated she was in agreement with Mayor Bergeson about doing a survey the <br />last time and asked that this discussion be scheduled for the next work session to assure the <br />referendums are not defeated. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated the Council will have to take some action on what will be placed on the <br />referendum. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated there will have to be some cutting and noted Page 7, D1. She asked why <br />something wasn't done with the percentages where it jumps to 7.61% and then goes down in 2006. <br />Finance Director Rolek stated this was presented to the Council several times and the staff was not <br />directed to make any cuts. <br />City Administrator Waite Smith stated that staff is trying to identify potential cuts in case there are <br />cuts in State aid but, at this point, those potential cuts in State aid are not yet known. Thus, staff does <br />not know how to adjust that number. <br />Finance Director Rolek stated that once the cuts are known, staff has the ability to make adjustments <br />to this plan, as needed. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 03-09, Adopting the Five -Year Financial <br />Plan for 2003-2007. Mayor Bergeson seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Carlson stated she will vote against the motion because increases of 7.61 % for 2004 <br />and 7.26% for 2005 are too much when the State is experiencing a $4.56 billion deficit. She made <br />reference to comments made by John Gunyou, former State Commissioner of Finance, who projected <br />it will more likely be significantly greater based on what the State is already committed to spend. She <br />stated it is not known how much the State aids will be cut and this plan depends on levy limits <br />expiring. She stated if 2001 was included it would have been a 41.47% increase and there are things <br />not stated in the plan that will be spent. She reviewed the cost of several City projects including "The <br />Village" which was proposed at $14 million. Councilmember Carlson stated she realizes that would <br />not be an expenditure for the City since it would be included in a TIF district but the City will not be <br />collecting taxes on it either. She stated this is significant spending in the next few years, the same <br />years the State deficit runs. She stated she respects everyone's vote but that is how she will have to <br />vote. She stated there are two other road proposals covered by MSA funding that are not part of the <br />general fund. She stated it is the general fund budget that she is objecting to because she needs to <br />look at it from the experience of the people she is representing. Councilmember Carlson commented <br />on the current state of the economy and impacts to Lino Lakes residents. She stated that under these <br />times she cannot support 7.61% and 7.26% over 2004 and 2005 and had hoped the Council could <br />compromise. She stated this is a democracy and she is happy with her vote and respects those of a <br />different opinion. <br />Councilmember Reinert asked Councilmember Carlson what level of increase, if any, she would <br />agree to. <br />3 <br />