Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 2003 <br />APROVED <br />1 Councilmember Carlson stated she agrees with Councilmember Reinert that stations should not be in <br />2 the Neighborhood Business district, but she disagrees with point two, because if it is legal to say areas <br />3 not zoned business should be zoned Neighborhood Business when they are changed, we should do <br />4 that. <br />5 <br />6 Community Development Director Grochala indicated that Planning and Zoning recommended to <br />7 eliminate gas stations from the Neighborhood Business district, and identify areas where <br />8 Neighborhood Buriness would be an appropriate use. He stated he would be concerned about all <br />9 areas not zoned business becoming Neighborhood Business districts. He indicated this would put <br />10 some of the prime space around the City as Neighborhood Business, which was not the intent of the <br />11 Planning and Zoning Board. <br />12 <br />13 Councilmember Dahl asked about Birch Street and Hodgson Road, wondering if it could be general <br />14 business that could facilitate gas stations, or would it only be able to be Neighborhood Business. She <br />15 indicated that if they remove the second part of the recommendation from Planning and Zoning, she <br />16 does not want it to come back and bite them later by finding out the business can get around it. <br />17 <br />18 City Planner Smyser stated that under the Comprehensive Plan, it says Commercial Use, not what <br />19 district it should be zoned. To say that Neighborhood Business does not include gas stations as a use <br />20 does not provide for a specific zone on a specific property. <br />21 <br />I22 Councilmember O'Donnell stated he still thinks zoning is a separate action. He indicated the Council <br />23 could at any time pass a resolution to zone an area as Neighborhood Business, they do not have to <br />24 wait for a developer to come in. City Planner Smyser stated this was correct. <br />25 <br />26 Councilmember Carlson asked what would be the legal basis for that decision. City Planner Smyser <br />27 indicated the Comprehensive Plan shows it as Commercial Use, it is up to the Council to decide what <br />28 kind of commercial. <br />29 <br />30 Councilmember Carlson stated City Planner Smyser went through the sites verbally and indicated <br />31 they were General Business. City Planner Smyser stated those were two different maps. He indicated <br />32 that when rezoning, they look at the Comprehensive Plan, both the map and the specific instructions <br />33 for a particular site. He stated they would then determine which zoning districts would be allowable <br />34 for that parcel. <br />35 <br />36 Councilmember Carlson asked what the Comprehensive Plan says about these two specific sites. City <br />37 Planner Smyser indicated it does not say a specific district that would be appropriate. <br />38 Councilmember Carlson asked which district it supports. City Planner Smyser stated the City <br />39 Council would need to decide that, and read the wording from the Comprehensive Plan for those two <br />40 sites. He indicated that in his opinion it could be any of the three. <br />41 <br />42 Councilmember Carlson stated the question here is we have two specific sites. She indicated there is <br />it43 enough information on one, but not on the other, however Staff does know what the commercial plans <br />44 are. She asked based on that, what Staff's recommendation would be. City Planner Smyser indicated <br />45 Staff has not made a recommendation. <br />25 <br />