My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/24/2003 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2003
>
02/24/2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 1:57:51 PM
Creation date
2/6/2015 1:15:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
02/24/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 24, 2003 <br />APROVED <br />1 Mayor Bergeson indicated that when you get into rural areas, you are cutting off the back access. City <br />2 Planner Smyser stated they could clarify it to say single family residential zoning districts. <br />3 <br />4 City Planner Smyser stated that on page 3-90, Subdivision 13, the section had been stricken <br />5 originally, but it was decided to keep it in. This section reads: <br />6 SUBD. 13. Farming Operations. All farms in existence upon the effective date of this <br />7 ordinance and all farms which are brought into the city by annexation shall be a permitted use. <br />8 All dwelling units and structures for processing of farm goods shall require a building permit <br />9 and conform to all requirements of the Building Code. The City Council may require any new <br />10 farm operation to secure a conditional use permit in the event of the following: <br />11 <br />12 A. The farm is adjacent to or within four hundred (400) feet of any dwelling unit <br />13 and may be detrimental to living conditions by emitting noise, odors, <br />14 vibrations, hazards to safety, and the like <br />15 B. The farming operations are so intensive as to constitute an industrial type use <br />16 consisting of the compounding, processing, and packaging of products for <br />17 wholesale or retail trade and further that such operations may tend to become <br />18 permanent industrial type operation that cannot be termed a normal farming <br />19 operation <br />20 <br />21 Councilmember O'Donnell asked what the thinking was in taking this out. City Planner Smyser <br />22 stated this is commercial guided residential. He indicated they do not want someone expanding their <br />23 business, or in case of a fire they do not want them to replace it because it is a non -conforming use. <br />24 He stated they had thought the farms were all in rural zoning, but have found that not all are. <br />25 <br />26 City Planner Smyser stated that page 3-96 talks about Co -Location Requirements for cell towers. He <br />27 indicated that the applicants used to have to prove there was nothing else within one mile that could <br />28 be used to put an antenna on, now that has been increased to two miles. <br />29 <br />30 City Planner Smyser advised that page 5-4 talks about Conditional Uses in rural zoning. He indicated <br />31 it has been recommended that tree services be added as a conditional use to the rural zone. He stated <br />32 that someone wants to put a tree service on a site currently zoned rural, however the guided long <br />33 range zoning is residential, even though the buildings are there now. He explained that Planning and <br />34 Zoning recommended changing the ordinance to allow a tree service to be in a rural zone. <br />35 <br />36 Mayor Bergeson indicated there were adjacent buildings, and asked if a tree service would be allowed <br />37 there. City Planner Smyser stated it would not. Mayor Bergeson clarified that making all those <br />38 buildings have the same zoning would not solve the issue. City Planner Smyser confirmed that was <br />39 correct, and indicated they would have to be changed to industrial use, unless the Council were to add <br />40 tree service to General Business. <br />41 <br />42 Mr. Joyer indicated he was representing the Flanagans, and the tree service. He indicated that the tree <br />I43 service owner was proposing to buy the property to store equipment for his tree service, which would <br />44 require storing equipment overnight, in a fenced area. He stated this was a less intense use of the <br />45 property versus the auto body shop, which typically has about 30 cars and operates at night and on <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.