03/10/2003 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 10, 2003 DRAFT 080 Mayor Bergeson asked for an informal poll of the Council's preference on this matter. 581 582 Councilmember O'Donnell indicated he would prefer to take Staff's lead and rather than do 583 something that may or may not be appropriate, leave it as is and amend it after the fact. 584 585 Councilmember Carlson stated she wants to address it now as they have a situation operating and 586 growing, and she is concerned that they may not come back and look at this right away. She believes 587 the ordinance could have an item K.2., dropping the 72 hour limit and picking up the other points that 588 apply to this size parcel. 589 590 Community Development Director Grochala reviewed how he thought item K., 1. and 2. would read. 591 Councilmember Carlson noted that once they have decided to make the change in this section, it is not 592 that difficult to determine wording. 593 594 Community Development Director Grochala stated item K.2. would say no more than two 595 commercial motor vehicles. City Attorney Hawkins noted two permits would not be needed for this, 596 one would suffice for the two vehicles. Mayor Bergeson asked if two was the right number. 597 Councilmember Carlson stated they had talked about two at the work session, noting that 2 1/2 acre to 598 10 acre lots were not that large to be able to accommodate more. 599 600Community Development Director Grochala clarified that current users would not have to comply. 001 City Attorney Hawkins indicated his agreement, noting they would be grandfathered non -conforming 602 uses. Councilmember Dahl asked if that would include anything questionable, whether legal or not, 603 that is happening at this time. City Attorney Hawkins offered that it either complies with the 604 ordinance now or it does not. 605 606 Mayor Bergeson asked if page 3-73 item K.2. was now part of the staff recommendation. Community 607 Development Director Grochala noted it is. 608 609 Councilmember Carlson asked if 3-90 has been left in. Community Development Director Grochala 610 indicated it has, noting that originally they were going to strike it. Councilmember Carlson advised 611 that this is one of the corrections she has for the February 24th minutes. She noted the minutes say 612 'City Planner Smyser stated 3-90 had been struck', but according to the tape he said '3-90 had been 613 struck, but now it was not going to be'. 614 615 Mayor Bergeson opened the floor for public comment. 616 617 Rod Kukonen, representing the Environmental Board, indicated he had two suggestions for changes. 618 He indicated on page 2-52 item 2., they propose striking the word `only', and adding wording so item 619 2. would read "Urban residential planned unit development shall be applied within the City's R-2, R- 620 3, and R-4 Zoning Districts and may be applied in R-1 and R -1X districts. He stated this does not 621 slam the door for using PUD within the R-1 and R -1X districts. 0622 14