03/10/2003 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 10, 2003 DRAFT •69 clarified that the sealcoatting, then, eliminates the cracks. City Engineer Studenski advised that it 270 seals the cracks to eliminate any deterioration caused by water getting into the cracks, which erodes 271 the road beneath. 272 273 Councilmember Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 03-36, authorizing preparation of plans and 274 specifications for 2003 Sealcoat Projects. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 275 276 Motion carried unanimously. 277 278 Resolution No. 03-36 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 279 280 Consideration of Resolution No. 03-37, Designating No Parking on Elm Street Reconstruction, 281 James Studenski — City Engineer Studenski presented his report, noting the recommendation of Staff 282 to adopt this resolution. 283 284 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 03-37, designating No Parking on Elm Street. 285 Councilmember O'Donnell seconded the motion. 286 287 Motion carried unanimously. 288 289 Resolution No. 03-37 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 11,90 291 Consideration of Second Reading of Ordinance No. 08-03, Zoning Regulations, Michael 292 Community Development Director Grochala — Community Development Director Grochala noted 293 that Council had two memos relating to the Zoning Ordinance, one from him outlining the changes 294 from the work session and one offering an opinion on the Tree Service issue. 295 296 Community Development Director Grochala outlined the minor changes, 1-10, that were results of 297 the City Council Work Session on March 5, 2003. He added that two additional changes from the 298 Environmental Board needed to be made, on pages 3-16 and 3-44, outlining what those are. He added 299 that one additional change not mentioned in the memo was on page 2-55, item 3, where 300 Environmental Board and Park Board have been added to PUD reviews. Previously it just indicated 301 Planning and Zoning Board. He noted two additional changes; to page 6-11 item C.2., it was 302 originally 90 feet, this has been changed to 80 feet; and page 6-11 item C.1., the Environmental Board 303 requested 'no fewer than' be removed in the sentence 'no fewer than 30 percent of all individual lots 304 in the subdivision shall be equal to or greater than 15,000 square feet in area', but that change has not 305 been made. He indicated that the discussion surrounding this request was that the board wanted to 306 promote maximizing open space. He stated the thought was by taking that wording out, it would 307 encourage the maximum space, by providing the minimum amount of 15,000 square foot lots 308 possible. He indicated Staff's concern was that by taking out the words 'no fewer than', it might be 309 interpreted as only 30 percent of lots could be 15,000 square feet, which would discourage use of this 310 zoning. S11 12 Mayor Bergeson stated that if someone was interested in using this zoning, he agrees they might be 313 more inclined to do so with some flexibility, rather than hard and fast rules. 7