My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/10/2003 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2003
>
03/10/2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 3:41:28 PM
Creation date
2/6/2015 1:43:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 10, 2003 <br />DRAFT <br />*59 <br />360 Mayor Bergeson stated he does not see how this would be able to be implemented. Councilmember <br />361 Carlson indicated it does not undo anything they are trying to accomplish. Community Development <br />362 Director Grochala stated item h. could go forward, his concern is with determining what is of `major <br />363 importance'. <br />364 <br />365 City Attorney Hawkins offered that it is always best to have standards, as the court will usually rule <br />366 against the city if there is some ambiguity. <br />367 <br />368 Mayor Bergeson asked if Staff agrees with adding item f. back in. Community Development Director <br />369 Grochala stated he prefers to have it out, but there are other standards so it would be okay with it in. <br />370 Mayor Bergeson asked for an informal poll of opinion on this matter. <br />371 <br />372 Councilmember O'Donnell indicated he would prefer to keep it as presented, with item f. out. <br />373 <br />374 Councilmember Carlson indicated she would like it put back in. <br />375 <br />376 Mayor Bergeson stated he would like it kept out. <br />377 <br />378 Councilmember Dahl stated she would like items f. and h. left in. <br />379 <br />080 City Attorney Hawkins asked if there was definition regarding either of these items. Community <br />381 Development Director Grochala stated that concerning item f., there are standards relating to traffic, <br />382 noise, and glare. City Administrator Waite -Smith stated that other government agencies have <br />383 standards that could be used. <br />384 <br />385 City Attorney Hawkins offered that in his opinion, item f. would be okay to leave in. He added that <br />386 item h. is vague, and it is not clear who determines what is of significant importance. <br />387 <br />388 Mayor Bergeson asked for a poll on item h. <br />389 <br />390 Councilmember O'Donnell indicated he would like it left out. <br />391 <br />392 Councilmember Carlson stated that when she is weighing her decision, she tries to look at things to <br />393 see if they are pro -developer or pro -citizen. She feels this is pro -citizen and supports leaving it in. <br />394 <br />395 Mayor Bergeson stated he would like it left out. <br />396 <br />397 Councilmember Dahl indicated she prefers it be left in. <br />398 <br />399 Community Development Director Grochala stated they could leave them both in. He indicated that <br />400 with item h. he thinks they will have some problems pop up, but it can be left in. <br />•401 <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.