Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 14, 2003 <br />APPROVED <br />0281 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER <br />282 <br />283 Consideration of Resolution No. 03-53 Authorizing Centennial School District to install a <br />284 private well at Rice Lake Elementary School — City Administrator Waite Smith stated there was a <br />285 budget meeting at the school tonight, so the Superintendent and Finance Director are unavailable. <br />286 The Deputy Superintendent is in attendance. She summarized the staff report, and indicated staff <br />287 recommendations need to be consistent with existing regulations, therefore they are recommending <br />288 denial, but the City Council has the authority to make exceptions. <br />289 <br />290 Councilmember Reinert asked if staff has been able to determine actual cost savings. City <br />291 Administrator Waite Smith stated that information was in the Friday packet, and their analysis shows <br />292 approximately $8500. She indicated the School District report was based on utility bills at schools <br />293 with irrigation wells. Rice Lake pays approximately $20,000 more than the other schools. <br />294 <br />295 Councilmember Carlson noted that only Rice Lake Elementary is in town, and the others, in other <br />296 surrounding cities that have lower water fees, which may account for some of the difference. She <br />297 stated she asked the City Attorney if the City Council has a legal right to do this, and to what degree. <br />298 Specifically, do they have the right to say no based on Section 401.15, since the school is not new; <br />299 and secondly, does the City Ordinance address irrigation wells. <br />300 <br />301 City Attorney Barry Sullivanindicated that it sounds like the school is asking for a private well, <br />302 whether irrigation or otherwise, and he is not aware of any State statutes that would prevent the City <br />303 Council from allowing it. <br />04 <br />305 Councilmember Carlson asked if the district even has to ask, since the well is not being hooked up to <br />306 their building. City Attorney Sullivan indicated he would assume staff reviewed this when they came <br />307 in for a permit to drill, and that is why the question is before the City Council. <br />308 <br />309 Councilmember Carlson stated that in the findings, it appears the City Council would approve this <br />310 because of the cost and the fact it is public money being used to pay the bills, but that would be <br />311 narrowing who could have a well such as this, and asked if they were being fair. <br />312 <br />313 Mayor Bergeson indicated there were other public facilities, like the prison, and could be others in the <br />314 future. Councilmember Carlson asked if the prison had a well. She stated Lino Lakes' water mains <br />315 were higher, and they made that decision because of their desire to be able to maintain them. She <br />316 stated if they open this option too wide, it would hamper the City's ability to support their mains. <br />317 <br />318 City Attorney Sullivan agreed they do not want to be too broad, and it is up to City Council <br />319 discretion. <br />320 <br />321 Councilmember Carlson asked about the City Code, which says financial need cannot be used as a <br />322 determining factor for a variance. She stated they have five standards, and this would not meet any of <br />323 them. City Attorney Sullivan indicated in his opinion he does not see this as being a zoning variance <br />324 that would need to meet those standards, but it might be an analogy. <br />325 <br />326 Councilmember Carlson stated she meant it as an analogy, making the point they need to be <br />a3327 consistent and fair with everyone, and if they do not have standards, that becomes difficult. <br />28 <br />7 <br />