Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 13, 2003 <br />APPROVED <br />1 <br />• 2 SPECIAL REVENUE / UTILITIES (RICK DEGARDNER) <br />3 <br />4 Public Services Director DeGardner reviewed the proposed 2004 budget for special <br />5 revenue/utilities. He stated the supplies line item in the water utility is proposed to be <br />6 reduced by 50 percent due to the completion of the MIU meter replacement program. He <br />7 also stated the sewer utility is proposed to increase 9.26 percent due to higher volumes <br />8 and higher rates by MCES. <br />9 <br />10 Finance Director Rolek stated the rates are up for review again this fall to determine the <br />11 rate structure for 2004. <br />12 <br />13 ADMINISTRATION / FINANCE (DAN TESCH / AL ROLEK) <br />14 <br />15 Director of Administration Tesch reviewed the proposed 2004 budget for <br />16 Administration/Finance. <br />17 <br />18 Mayor & Council — Director of Administration Tesch explained the proposed budget for <br />19 Mayor & Council would be decreased 5.15 percent. <br />20 <br />21 Administration — Director of Administration Tesch stated the Timesavers expenditure <br />22 would be decreased due to less detail in the minutes. <br />23 <br />• 24 Finance — Finance Director Rolek stated there is a proposed 2.89 percent decrease in the <br />25 finance department budget.The proposal does not include funds for a future upgrade for <br />26 financial software. He also stated they would begin an analysis for an in-house assessor <br />27 for 2005. <br />28 <br />29 Other — Finance Director Rolek stated the contingency fund is also proposed to decrease. <br />30 <br />31 Personnel — City Administrator Waite Smith stated salaries were not market adjusted last <br />32 year, but the proposed budget does include these adjustments. She stated if the City <br />33 strives for average market salaries that it eases labor negotiations. Earlier this year it look <br />34 as if there would be no salary increases and the unions agreed that saving jobs were more <br />35 important than the increases. <br />36 <br />37 Mayor Bergeson stated all employees would like cost -of -living adjustment increases and <br />38 some positions are out of sync with the market averages. Because there are limited funds, <br />39 is one more important than the other. <br />40 <br />41 City Administrator Waite Smith stated parameters need to be set first and that they should <br />42 not treat managers and non -managers differently. <br />43 <br />44 Councilmember Carlson requested historical information for the last three years about <br />45 salary increases for each position. <br />46 <br />• 47 City Administrator Waite Smith stated this information would be available at the next <br />48 City Council meeting. <br />