Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 7, 2004 <br />NOT APPROVED BY MAJORITY OF COUNCIL ON 06-28-2004 <br />1 LAKE DRIVE/I35W INTERCHANGE STUDY, MICHAEL GROCHALA <br />• 2 <br />3 Community Development Director Grochala stated that as part of the Legacy at Woods <br />4 Edge development review process, a traffic study identified the necessary improvements <br />5 to Lake Drive that would be required to facilitate development. He reviewed the <br />6 necessary improvements noting while the feasibility study for the proposed <br />7 improvements, both internal and external to the Legacy site, is just commencing, the very <br />8 preliminary cost estimate for the Lake Drive improvements is approximately $2.4 <br />9 million. It is anticipated that these improvements would be, for the most part temporary, <br />10 until the reconstruction of the I -35W interchange. <br />11 <br />12 Community Development Director Grochala stated that because of the estimated cost of <br />13 the Lake Drive improvements and the recognized need for improving the I -35W <br />14 interchange, staff is evaluating options to: 1) facilitate improvement of the interchange in <br />15 conjunction with the Legacy project: 2) minimize the extent of reconstruction if the <br />16 interchange is constructed at a later date; and 3) provide a planning base to pursue county, <br />17 state and/or federal funding for interchange improvements. <br />18 <br />19 Staff has requested a proposal from a consultant to determine the needed lane <br />20 configurations and geometry for the Lake Drive/I-35W interchange between Town Center <br />21 Parkway and Apollo Drive. Costs estimates would also be provided for the proposed <br />22 improvements. These services would be done for a cost not to exceed $22,500. <br />23 <br />• 24 Community Development Director Grochala stated given that Lake Drive improvements <br />25 are necessary to facilitate the Legacy at Woods Edge and YMCA project, it is staff s <br />26 opinion that any possibilities to incorporate the improvements into a more comprehensive <br />27 plan should be explored. Therefore staff is requesting City Council direction to pursue <br />28 the study and to approach Anoka County regarding a cost sharing. It is staff's intent to <br />29 bring the proposal to the City Council for authorization at the April 26, 2004, City <br />30 Council meeting. <br />31 <br />32 Council directed staff to move forward with the study as well as pursuing cost sharing <br />33 with Anoka County. <br />34 <br />35 Ms. Rhonda Sivarajah, Anoka County Commissioner, advised that typically the County <br />36 does share in the cost if a project is completed. She noted she has been working on <br />37 several interchanges within the County and trying to obtain federal funds for <br />38 improvements. <br />39 <br />40 This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, April 26, 2004, 6:30 p.m. <br />41 <br />42 STREET LIGHT REQUESTS, RICK DEGARDNER <br />43 <br />44 Public Services Director DeGardner advised that until 2001, the City had budgeted <br />45 dollars in the street lighting line item budget to provide funding for the installation of 1-2 <br />46 streetlights each year. With the need to reduce the City's budget expenditures, the <br />• 47 provision for the budgeting for new streetlights has been eliminated since 2002. <br />48 Consequently, there are not any 2004 general fund dollars available for new streetlights. <br />