My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/26/2004 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2004
>
04/26/2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2015 2:21:09 PM
Creation date
2/10/2015 9:37:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
04/26/2004
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 26, 2004 <br />APPROVED <br />1 Councilmember Stoltz made a motion to adopt Resolution 04-47, Resolution Authorizing Execution <br />• 2 of Development Agreement, Century Farm North 2nd Addition. Councilmember Reinert seconded the <br />3 motion. <br />4 <br />5 Councilmember Carlson noted that the park dedication fees are a part of the Development Agreement. <br />6 <br />7 The motion carried, with a vote of 3-2. Reinert, Stoltz and Bergeson voted aye. Carlson and Dahl <br />8 voted nay. <br />9 <br />10 Resolution No. 04-47 can be found in the City Clerk's office. <br />11 <br />12 C. Consideration of Resolution No. 04-50, Approving Variance from Lot Area, Lot Width <br />13 and Road Frontage Requirements, St. Paul Regional Water Services, Jeff Smyser <br />14 <br />15 City Planner Smyser stated that St. Paul Regional Water Services owns numerous pieces of property <br />16 on and near lakes in Lino Lakes and Centerville, and that one of those parcels includes the dam <br />17 between Peltier Lake and George Watch Lake. He stated St. Paul Water wishes to divide this parcel, <br />18 keep the part with the dam, and sell the rest to Anoka County to include in the regional park. He <br />19 stated that because the parcel has no frontage and is shaped very oddly, several variances are needed. <br />20 He also stated that no development will occur on the site. <br />21 <br />22 City Planner Smyser stated the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the <br />23 variances, and that City Staff also recommend approval of Resolution 04-50. <br />24 <br />25 Councilmember Dahl made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 04-50, Approving Variance from Lot <br />26 Area, Lot Width and Road Frontage Requirements, and for the St. Paul Regional Water Services, as <br />27 outlined in the staff report. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion. <br />28 <br />29 Motion carried unanimously. <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 Resolution No. 04-50 can be found in the City Clerk's office. <br />33 <br />34 D. Consideration of Resolution No. 04-51, Denying Variance from Lot Area and Lot Width <br />35 Requirements, Martha Houle and John DeHaven (1612 Birch St.), Jeff Smyser <br />36 <br />37 City Planner Smyser indicated there was an error in the Staff Report, and that the Planning and <br />38 Zoning Commission had actually recommended denial of the variances, not approval. <br />39 <br />40 City Planner Smyser stated Martha Houle and John DeHaven have submitted a request for variances <br />41 from requirements for minimum lot area and lot width. Their property at 1612 Birch St. comprises 15 <br />42 acres. They wish to divide the property into two parcels. This would be a minor subdivision and <br />43 does not require public review; it is done administratively. However, the subdivision proposal does <br />44 not meet lot dimension requirements. The property owners have requested the variances from those <br />45 requirements. <br />46 <br />47 City Planner Smyser stated the site is in a stage 2 growth area, which is intended for development <br />• 48 after year 2010. The site is not in the current MUSA, and the site is zoned Rural. In the Rural zoning <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.