My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/12/2004 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2004
>
10/12/2004 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2015 2:24:17 PM
Creation date
2/10/2015 12:15:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/12/2004
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES October 12, 2004 <br />APPROVED <br />Amk192 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 04-149 approving the Development Agreement <br />193 for Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. <br />194 <br />195 Mayor Bergeson commented he feels these were two separate actions, with the first being whether the <br />196 project should be approved, to which he voted no, although the action passed. He stated this second <br />197 action relates to details of how the project will be completed, to which he will vote in support of this <br />198 Development Agreement. He indicated the City has committed to this project and he thinks if it is <br />199 going to be done it is important that it happens in an orderly and efficient manner. <br />200 <br />201 Motion carried unanimously. <br />202 <br />203 E. Consideration of Resolution No. 04-139, Approving Redevelopment Contract for Legacy <br />204 at Woods Edge, Michael Grochala <br />205 <br />206 Community Development Director Grochala summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff <br />207 recommends approval. <br />208 <br />209 Steve Bubul, attorney and consultant for the City, summarized the terms of the Redevelopment <br />210 Contract, which explains how the land will be used and how it will be purchased. He advised they <br />211 have laid out a plan for how soon each phase of development within the TIF District must be built <br />212 out, and there are covenants concerning the housing units within the development, both in regard to <br />213 owner/occupancy, affordability, and creation of senior -only units. <br />214 <br />Councilmember Carlson asked how many acres of City land and lands in the sandblasting site are <br />16 included, and how much the City paid for the portion of property they are selling. Community <br />217 Development Director Grochala advised there are 11.67 acres of City land and 29 acres from the <br />218 sandblasting site, with an original purchase price to the City of $1.79 per square foot in 1977. <br />219 <br />220 Bill Griffith, Hartford Group, commented on how they felt they were meeting the City's requirements <br />221 for mix of housing and mix of owner/occupancy and rental options, and most recently with the <br />222 covenants they have created regarding property management. He stated this demonstrates their <br />223 continued desire to work with the City to deliver the kind of development the City has envisioned. <br />224 <br />225 Mayor Bergeson reopened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. <br />226 <br />227 Councilmember Reinert moved to close the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. Councilmember Stoltz <br />228 seconded the motion. <br />229 <br />230 Motion carried unanimously. <br />231 <br />232 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 04 -approving a Redevelopment Contract for <br />233 Legacy at Woods Edge. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion. <br />234 <br />235 Councilmember Carlson commented that overall she supports the project, but has concerns about the <br />236 senior building that was previously proposed, but is not part of the plan. She stated there are <br />237 unanswered questions, and she would like to know the entire plan before committing to the funding. <br />. <br />38 She expressed concerns about licensing and maintenance of the rental units, and not having answers <br />39 from the Metropolitan Council or Mn/Dot on contributions to the funding for improvements. She <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.