Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES November 22, 2004 <br />APPROVED <br />1,44 endowment would not be possible. He indicated he is unsure what the price projections are for these <br />45 homes, but it is possible that what the city perceives as value added by using the Conservation track <br />146 would also be perceived as value to individual homeowners. He stated that in that case it is <br />147 conceivable that the prices could be higher. <br />148 <br />149 Councilmember Carlson expressed concern that while there is a limit of 147 new homes per year <br />150 under the Traditional Development track, there is no limit under the Conservation Development track. <br />151 She stated she also feels the City Council cannot be arbitrary in what it approves or does not approve. <br />152 <br />153 Mr. Schoenbauer stressed that the Council has complete discretion on how many homes they allow <br />154 and what types of developments they allow under the Conservation track, therefore it does not give <br />155 free reign to the developers. He stated that the growth limit of the city would remain at 147 units per <br />156 year unless the City Council determined there was enough public value added to allow more. He <br />157 stated there are also other control mechanisms in place for the City to utilize to control growth. <br />158 <br />159 Marty Asleson, Environmental Coordinator, indicated the Board was very supportive of the proposal, <br />160 but there were a lot of questions. He stated the questions mainly centered on the numbers and the <br />161 issues involved with growth. He indicated he believes they determined that this ordinance was <br />162 meeting the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />163 <br />164 City Planner Smyser stated there was a lot of discussion at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting as <br />165 well, and they felt overwhelmingly that this was the best way for the City to go. He indicated the <br />166 vote was 5:1. <br />.67 <br />68 Councilmember Dahl asked for clarification on the endowment, which Mr. Schoenbauer provided. <br />169 <br />170 Mayor Bergeson asked Staff to research and verify that they will not have a transition issue with the <br />171 number of approved homes if this ordinance is passed. <br />172 <br />173 Rob Rafferty, 1573 Merganser Court indicated he was speaking here as a citizen, and not as a <br />174 member of the Planning and Zoning Board. He stated his support for the ordinance, noting that he <br />175 believes it is a very well thought out process and it was very proactive of Staff to have taken the <br />176 Comprehensive Plan to the next level while determining how to address the needs of the <br />177 Environmental Board in a very positive manner. He indicated that as they heard with the credit rating <br />178 upgrade, this provides another opportunity for this Council and the Councils that follow to make well <br />179 thought out decisions. He stated in his mind, master planning is the key to the success of the city. <br />180 <br />181 Councilmember Stoltz moved to approve the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 24-04 amending <br />182 Ordinance 01-03, Growth Management Policy as outlined in the Staff report. Councilmember Reinert <br />183 seconded the motion. <br />184 <br />185 Councilmember Carlson commented she has concerns about changing the Comprehensive Plan, <br />186 which involved a great deal of public input, without getting additional public input now. She noted <br />187 that she is not sure if the roads can handle more than 147 new homes per year, and stated that the <br />188 MUSA allocation is supposed to be another control, but Lino Lakes would be able to get more MUSA <br />189 from the Metropolitan Council. She stated she would like to know who is going to pay for the <br />90 infrastructure of the city. <br />W91 <br />4 <br />