Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES January 10, 2005 <br />APPROVED <br />241 concern is that this site is 1/2 mile away and has a larger 20 x 22 foot building instead of the size <br />. <br />42 previously proposed. <br />43 <br />244 Community Development Director Grochala clarified that the aesthetics of this well structure have <br />245 changed. He stated the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan identifies conceptually where the <br />246 wells need to be and the size of the pipes needed, etc. He indicated Staff is trying to put in this <br />247 service at the lowest cost possible to the residents of Lino Lakes. He stated the soil at the location <br />248 shown on the Water System Plan is not conducive to a well so Staff tried to find other locations <br />249 available without having to purchase additional land. He verified all Staff was requesting at this time <br />250 was permission to have soil borings completed at the site. <br />251 <br />252 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 04-199 authorizing soil borings, Well No. 5. <br />253 Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion. <br />254 <br />255 Councilmember Carlson commented that this well could go on empty land that is being developed, <br />256 and could have a smaller building. She stated she received a call from someone who did not know <br />257 the lift station was going in the location it is when that resident purchased their home, and now this <br />258 well is proposed for the same neighborhood. She believes two wells and a lift station are too much <br />259 for one neighborhood to bear. <br />260 <br />261 Councilmember Reinert noted that the construction of Well 5 is a few years late in terms of when it <br />262 was planned, and Well 6 will be needed in the next couple of years also. <br />263 <br />264 Mayor Bergeson stated that he does not think that they, as the City Council, should second guess the <br />.65 engineers who tell them that the well needs to be in this part of the city. He indicated the City already <br />66 owns this land. He stated the Council needs to respond to the requests of the engineering staff and <br />267 support their recommendation. He added that should this location be where the well is placed, careful <br />268 consideration will be given to the size and aesthetics of the structure. He stated he fully supports their <br />269 staff and the fine work they do trying to stay ahead of the water needs. <br />270 <br />271 Vote: 4:1 Councilmember Carlson opposed. Motion carried. <br />272 <br />273 Resolution No. 04-199 can be found in the City Clerk's office. <br />274 <br />275 D. Consideration of Resolution No. 04-201, Modifying Tax Increment Financing District <br />276 No. 1-11, Michael Grochala <br />277 <br />278 Community Development Director Grochala summarized the Staff report, indicating that Staff is <br />279 recommending approval. <br />280 <br />281 Councilmember Carlson expressed concern about approving this resolution as she is not in favor of <br />282 the $26,000,000 in public costs. <br />283 <br />284 Community Development Director Grochala clarified that the tax increment plan before the City <br />285 Council was approved previously, and the $26,000,000, which is the budget amount in the plan, is the <br />286 amount available over twenty years of TIF. He stated this was already approved and the City has <br />287entered into an agreement with the Hartford Group, and it does not represent a $26,000,000 cost to <br />•88 the City. <br />6 <br />