Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 6, 2005 <br />APPROVED <br />• 1 Ms. Retzer went over the three ways to appoint a charter commission, noting there is no <br />2 longer a term limit for commissioners. The function of the charter commission is to <br />3 frame and amend the charter as needed. The commission must also entertain petitions <br />4 from citizens. Ms. Retzer noted it is very important for Councils and commissions to <br />5 work together in terms of advocacy and finances. She cautioned the Council regarding <br />6 the difference between advocacy and information in terms of the Charter Commission. <br />7 <br />8 Ms. Retzer advised there are five ways to originate an amendment to the charter: 1) <br />9 proposal by charter commission; 2) citizen petition; 3) proposal by Council; 4) <br />10 recommendation by commission to the Council for an ordinance change (does not go to <br />11 the voters); and 5) Council proposal in cities of populations less than 10,000 (does not <br />12 have to be submitted to the commission). <br />13 <br />14 Ms. Retzer advised only three cities within the state have abandoned their home rule <br />15 charter since 1989. She referred to the handouts distributed that included a charter survey <br />16 and their Model Charter for Minnesota Cities. <br />17 <br />18 Ms. Retzer noted if a city is concerned with who is appointed to the charter commission, <br />19 the Council and/or Charter Commission can make recommendations for appointments. <br />20 <br />21 In response to questions regarding the role of the charter commission, Ms. Retzer again <br />22 noted the only function set forth in state statutes in relation to the function of the charter <br />23 commission is to frame and amend the charter as needed. The charter commission is not <br />• 24 an advisory board and should not take an advocacy role within the City. The commission <br />25 should remain neutral on political issues and does not have the authority to set policy or <br />26 take policy positions. However, a charter commission member may express personal <br />27 opinions in relation to City issues, as long as he or she is not representing the entire <br />28 charter commission. <br />29 <br />30 The Council directed staff to obtain information regarding the City's insurance policy in <br />31 relation to coverage of the Charter Commission. <br />32 <br />33 City Administrator Heitke indicated he would be asking for more direction from the City <br />34 Attorney regarding future discussions held between the City Council and Charter <br />35 Commission in relation to advocacy concerns in response to the information provided by <br />36 Ms. Retzer. <br />37 <br />38 Ms. Rylee indicated to the Council they may call her or e-mail her if there are any <br />39 additional questions. <br />40 <br />41 Mayor Bergeson called for a short break at 6:55 p.m. <br />42 Mayor Bergeson reconvened the meeting at 7:02 p.m. <br />43 <br />44 I -35E CORRIDOR (ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) - <br />45 JOHN SHARDLOW <br />46 <br />• 47 Mr. John Shardlow, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban, Inc., advised he would be going <br />48 through the different development scenarios section by section. He reviewed the various <br />