Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 30, 2005 <br />APPROVED <br />1 potential adjustments have been identified in both the revenue and expenditure areas. <br />2 These have been divided into additional "tiers". Tier II adjustments bring the budget to a <br />3 level that maintains a level tax rate. Tier III adjustments bring the total adjustments to the <br />4 Council directed $500,000 level. <br />5 <br />6 Finance Director Rolek advised the intention in identifying potential adjustments is to <br />7 avoid "quick fix" measures such as shifting expenditures from one period to the next, and <br />8 to prioritize cuts to preserve the highest service levels possible. Some services will be <br />9 impacted in the near and, potentially, longer term as a result of the adjustments. Some <br />10 initiatives and acquisitions have been put off indefinitely due to these adjustments. <br />11 <br />12 Finance Director Rolek stated the handout holds the potential adjustments identified by <br />13 staff, including amounts and service level impacts. As stated earlier, they are prioritized <br />14 by "tier". No cuts to existing staff level have been affected. <br />15 <br />16 Finance Director Rolek reviewed the revenue potion of the handout noting they are only <br />17 projections. Staff does not know if the revenues will increase or decrease in 2006. <br />18 Revenues will have to be monitored closely throughout the year. <br />19 <br />20 Council determined the projected revenues would stay as proposed within the 2006 <br />21 Budget. <br />22 <br />23 Finance Director Rolek reviewed the expenditure portion of the handout, including Tier I <br />24 and Tier II, noting staff is really perceiving the cuts as permanent cuts. The cuts would <br />25 continue into the future unless the state takes a different approach with funding. <br />26 <br />27 Finance Director Rolek also advised that the City's tax rate has gone down in the past few <br />28 years. Because of a shift in state aid funding, the City has to make budget reductions or <br />29 increase the levy. Staff believes the City will not see the market value credit come back <br />30 to the City. <br />31 <br />32 Council determined the proposed $35,000 for professional services and the $18,870 for <br />33 contractual services should not be cut from the 2006 budget. <br />34 <br />35 After much discussion, the Council agreed the Economical Development Professional <br />36 Services in the amount of $5,000 and $12,000 would be cut from the budget. Note this <br />37 was included in the prior number. <br />38 <br />39 The majority of the Council indicated strong support for keeping $50,000 for Park Capital <br />40 Outlay (trail extensions) within the 2006 budget. <br />41 <br />42 Staff identified the proposed cuts that the Council wanted to remain in the budget, which <br />43 totaled approximately $104,000. Finance Director Rolek reviewed possible budget cuts <br />44 from the Tier III list noting it is possible for the City to reach cuts in the amount of <br />45 $104,000 from that list. <br />