Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 13, 2005 <br />APPROVED <br />1 <br />2 Community Development Director Grochala advised Hartford had now requested that the <br />3 Contract be amended to permit different terms for dispersal of the $1.7 million. The <br />4 reason for this request is that Hartford purchased the "TIF Parcel" from the Tagg's under <br />5 a note and mortgage, which Hartford expected to pay with proceeds of the interfund Loan <br />6 (assuming the conditions described above would be met, given the expected townhome <br />7 development). When the townhome development did not occur as planned, the Interfund <br />8 Loan was not disbursed, and the mortgage on the TIF parcel held by the Tagg's is now in <br />9 default. <br />10 <br />11 Community Development Director Grochala stated the proposed amendment provides an <br />12 alternative disbursing procedure, summarized as follows: <br />13 <br />14 1. $750,000 from the Met Council grant would be disbursed immediately after <br />15 approval of the Contract amendment, so long as Development Property Owner <br />16 secures a "forbearance agreement" from the Tagg's. That is, the Tagg's would <br />17 agree not to take significant mortgage foreclosure actions before December 31, <br />18 2005 (except as described as below). <br />19 <br />20 2. If the site plan and final plat is approved by October 15, 2005, the EDA would <br />21 disburse the balance of $950,000 on that date, so long as Development Property <br />22 owner has delivered Assessment Agreements that set a minimum market value <br />23 needed to generate enough Tax Increment to repay the Interfund Loan. This is <br />24 similar to the original Contract terms, except that the Interfund Loan amount has <br />25 been reduced from $1.7 million to $950,000 and the requirement for a building <br />26 permit has been omitted. If this occurs, the Tagg mortgage would be satisfied, <br />27 and the development would proceed as under the original Contract. <br />28 <br />29 3. If the site plan and final plat are not approved by October 15, the EDA would <br />30 nevertheless disburse $400,000 of the Interfund Loan on that date. However, this <br />31 amount would be a forgivable loan, repayable if the site plan and plat approvals <br />32 do not occur by April 30, 2006. Also, the City would have a third mortgage, and <br />33 assessment agreements must be in place to cover the full $950,000. The Tagg <br />34 forbearance agreement would remain in effect through December 31, 2005. <br />35 However, if the conditions for this partial disbursement are not met (e.g., <br />36 Assessment Agreements are not in place), the Tagg forbearance agreement may <br />37 terminate on October 15 and the Tagg's may proceed with foreclosure. <br />38 <br />39 4. If the partial disbursement is made on October 15, but the site plan and plat are <br />40 not approved by April 30,2006, the Development will have defaulted on the <br />41 obligation to commence construction by that date and the EDA will have all the <br />42 remedies under the Contract (including the option to terminate). <br />43 <br />44 Community Development Director Grochala stated that while the proposed changes <br />45 represent a departure from the original requirements, staff is confident that the City's <br />