My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/13/2005 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2005
>
10/13/2005 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2015 12:11:23 PM
Creation date
2/11/2015 11:05:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/13/2005
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 13, 2005 <br />APPROVED <br />1 Commissioner Warrem stated properly informing the residents is key to making progress <br />2 in the City without referendums. The City may want to make amendments within the <br />3 Charter to make that process easier. <br />4 <br />5 Commissioner Storberg asked how the Council has informed the citizens of the <br />6 referendum. <br />7 <br />8 Councilmember Reinert stated the City did have a proposal from a company for a <br />9 communication plan. The proposal failed on a 2-2 vote. <br />10 <br />11 Mayor Bergeson suggested that if the City does not get everything done in time for a <br />12 referendum, the project be moved to a vote in the following year. <br />13 <br />14 Chair Trehus stated there is a time limit within the Charter relating to a failed referendum. <br />15 He stated the Commission might want to look at amending that portion of the Charter. <br />16 <br />17 Chair Trehus referred to the West Shadow Lake Drive Area petition that is now on the <br />18 ballot. He asked why there was not a survey done before ordering the feasibility study. <br />19 <br />20 City Administrator Heitke advised he knows of only one project where a survey has been <br />21 done. However, the City cannot continue to pay for feasibility studies if there is not <br />22 enough interest in the project. Surveys will be utilized more in the future. <br />23 <br />24 Chair Trehus stated he would like the City to do more surveys on projects as opposed to <br />25 residents or the City paying for feasibility studies without knowing if a project will go <br />26 through. <br />27 <br />28 Mayor Bergeson stated the Council should discuss when surveys are used as opposed to <br />29 ordering feasibility studies. <br />30 <br />31 Commissioner Storberg asked if the Charter Commission could call the City Attorney <br />32 with legal questions. She also asked if the Charter Commission's yearly budget could be <br />33 accumulated if it is not spent every year. <br />34 <br />35 City Administrator Heitke suggested the Commission request more dollars during the <br />36 budget process. <br />37 <br />38 Chair Trehus requested the Commission be copied on all surveys and petitions that have <br />39 been accumulated in the past year. <br />40 <br />41 Commissioner Storberg suggested the City have a more standard form for petitions. <br />42 <br />43 Pavement Management Report - Chair Trehus advised the Commission was expecting <br />44 an update and feedback during the meeting that was scheduled in April. He asked for any <br />45 comments relating to the Pavement Management Report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.