My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/23/2006 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2006
>
01/23/2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2015 1:51:48 PM
Creation date
2/11/2015 1:03:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
01/23/2006
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 23, 2006 <br />APPROVED <br />004 Community Development Director Grochala commented that the Environmental Board and the <br />405 Planning and Zoning Board noticed that even though they are slowing down growth with the growth <br />406 management plan, they are not really permitting the kind of growth that the City would want. He <br />407 stated the developer has walked through the process with us for two years, and this is the kick off to <br />408 what will need to be done over the next few years. He indicated there will be a lot of tough decisions <br />409 over the next six months, but he wants to make it clear that this did not just happen without a lot of <br />410 thought and a lot of input from the community <br />411 <br />412 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-153 approving amendment of the <br />413 Comprehensive Plan to amend the proposed land use map, request 370 acres of MUSA, and amend <br />414 text with the changes outlined by staff. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion. <br />415 <br />416 Councilmember Carlson expressed continued concern about the amount of development being <br />417 proposed. She read a letter from Centerville indicating they have reservations on the development, <br />418 and would like to delay development until CSAH 14 improvement is underway. She commented that <br />419 as was mentioned, they did just approve this Comprehensive Plan in 2003. She stated she would <br />420 support a new review, but that is a different process than the process this took, and requires a citizen <br />421 review. <br />422 <br />423 Councilmember Reinert noted there was a citizen survey done a few years back, and there is a new <br />424 one being done, and while growth was one issue, taxes were another. He stated the people want a <br />25 diversification of the tax base, as well as places to shop within the city. He noted this development <br />W26 provides nine miles of trails, and 70 to 8.0 acres of open space. He stated that the letter from <br />427 Centerville City Council was from one of their members, andnot from the Council as a whole. He <br />428 commented that the cities around them are adding hundreds of homes per year, and if they go even to <br />429 247 units he thinks that is still conservative. <br />430 <br />431 Councilmember Carlson clarified that the letter from Centerville indicates that the Planning <br />432 Commission and the City Council reviewed the Comprehensive Plan amendment. She stated that <br />433 because it is signed by the mayor, she thinks it is a letter from Centerville, not a single City Council <br />434 member. She indicated she stands by the numbers she quoted and her concern about the level of <br />435 growth and the pressures that will be placed on them concerning other areas of the city. <br />436 <br />437 City Administrator Heitke indicated that the letter form Centerville was discussed at the work session, <br />438 and he has responded. He indicated that to be fair since the letter was read into the record, they need <br />439 to hear staff response. <br />440 <br />441 Community Development Director Grochala stated that he has responded to the letter and has <br />442 discussed the proposal with them, and after explaining this was not approval of a project, but only a <br />443 Comprehensive Plan amendment, they were perfectly comfortable with it. He stated that both cities <br />444 are concerned with the need for improvement of several roads in conjunction with this project. <br />445 <br />446 Councilmember O'Donnell indicated that there are a lot of facts and figures. He stated that one <br />. <br />47 weekend he tried to get a grasp on this, and contacted several members of the Environmental Board, <br />48 speaking with three. He indicated they were all supportive of this project. He stated they knew there <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.