Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL FINANCIAL RETREAT AUGUST 9, 2006 <br />APPROVED <br />The Council directed staff to further investigate options for repayment of the loan <br />including increased Park Dedication fees, valuation of the land and possibly selling a <br />portion of it and other revenue sources. <br />Finance Director Rolek provided the background of the Storm Management Fund noting <br />it is clear that the use of storm water development fees for maintenance purposes is not an <br />appropriate or intended use of these funds. It is also clear that there are ever-increasing <br />regulations relative to surface water standards and the clean water act. These are <br />unfunded mandates, which the City will need to find a way to fund. <br />Finance Director Rolek advised staff is recommending that a permanent funding source <br />be established to pay for ongoing maintenance of this storm water system. Because there <br />is equity to the system where those who have the most impervious surfaces have the most <br />runoff and should pay the most, and vice -versa, staff is recommending continuing to <br />pursue a storm water utility. It is the most equitable — though not perfectly equitable — <br />method to finance maintenance of this system. If the utility is not implemented, property <br />taxes will need to be levied to maintain the system. The costs are there and they are real; <br />the only question is how to pay them. Staff feels a storm water utility is the best way at <br />this time. <br />The Council agreed staff should continue exploring the possibility of a storm water utility <br />that includes an educational plan for residents as well as more equitable ways to <br />implement the plan such as assessments. Council also requested staff look into possible <br />grants as a way to offset those costs. <br />Finance Director Rolek referred to the Area and Unit Fund noting the sharp decline in <br />fund balance over the last five years. It is clear that this fund no longer has the capacity to <br />carry capital improvement projects until an event occurs that triggers payment of hook-up <br />and trunk fees. In the absence of a large infusion of capital from a future development, <br />the full cost of projects, less oversizing and City -borne costs, must be assessed to <br />benefited properties. <br />Finance Director Rolek stated staff is in the process of collecting policies used in other <br />communities to model a new policy for consideration by the City Council. This is an <br />important issue that needs to be addressed and changed in order to maintain the integrity <br />of this fund and to continue to service debt attributable to this fund. <br />The Council directed staff to continue collecting other city policies and bring forward a <br />recommendation. The Council also requested information regarding the amount of <br />deferred assessments and a timetable relating to those assessments. <br />Finance Director Rolek advised staff would like Springsted to conduct a Utility Rate <br />Study. <br />• <br />