Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION February 7, 2007 <br />APPROVED <br />91 pointed out the seven goals identified by his group. Specifically in the area of housing, <br />92 the group understood that the senior element is on the way and life cycle housing should <br />93 be planned. They also recognized survey results that indicate a need for single family <br />94 affordable housing. The group discussed but didn't reach a conclusion on the question of <br />95 whether it is the role of the community to shape housing or provide what the market <br />96 demands. <br />97 <br />98 Economic and Commercial Development — Mr. Granquist reviewed the four goals <br />99 developed by his group. He pointed out that in the area of attracting and encouraging <br />100 high tech development, the council may notice that attraction of heavy industrial is <br />101 missing because from a quality of life viewpoint that type of development is not seen as <br />102 desirable to the citizens. The work group did highlight that there are many young <br />103 children in the community that will soon grow into teens who will need <br />104 entertainment/leisure opportunities. There was recognition that developments should not <br />105 be on one side of the city or another but should be located so as to join the city. There <br />106 was also recognition of the importance of tax lowering development but not to the point <br />107 where people expect to be able to work in the city. Commercial development that fits the <br />108 residential character of the area is preferred. The challenge is to achieve a change in <br />109 culture and the perception that Lino Lakes is not "business friendly" and to inspire <br />110 residents to utilize the businesses that locate in the city. On the matter of tax incentives <br />111 for desired development, it is an area that is not real understandable to the general public <br />112 and education would be helpful. <br />113 <br />114 Roads and Transportation — Mr. Brown outlined the work of this group that dealt with <br />115 transportation including streets but also related items such as trails, carpool lots and <br />116 access to open spaces. Road reconstruction is an issue and the group recognized that the <br />117 city must be able to fix and maintain its streets and the council should be able to direct <br />118 that process. The city's pavement management plan sets forth the needs but they are not <br />119 being met and the problem will drop onto the city at once. <br />120 <br />121 The council suggested that the information received from the group presents an <br />122 opportunity to use citizen input and set goals to move forward on the issue of road <br />123 reconstruction. The city charter contains language on the road reconstruction process and <br />124 since the charter is a citizens' document, it seems appropriate to start looking at the <br />125 process through the citizenry. A citizens group could work independently and gather <br />126 information to report back to the city leadership. <br />127 (See staff direction at the conclusion of the minutes) <br />128 <br />129 Community Amenities and Natural Resources — Ms. Brunner reviewed the goals <br />130 established by the group. She noted discussion about how to build community support <br />131 for development of a multi -use recreation facility. The group recognized that most new <br />132 amenities would require tax funding or leveraging of outside dollars and that is a <br />133 challenge. There was discussion about involving a private entity such as a sponsor or <br />134 working with surrounding communities. <br />135 <br />