Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES May 29, 2007 <br />APPROVED <br />178 Engineer Studenski reported that the Planning and Zoning Board voted to deny the conditional use <br />.79 permit and the rationale is provided in the staff report. City staff is recommending approval of the <br />180 permit with the conditions listed in the staff report. <br />181 <br />182 Marcel Eibensteiner, owner of property, addressed the Council. He is a law abiding citizen and didn't <br />183 realize the top soil was any kind of a violation. The site has already been improved substantially and <br />184 the amount of soil reduced with the filling in of the property where the house was removed. All <br />185 conditions requested by staff are acceptable to him except the County's turn lane requirements as they <br />186 are cost prohibitive. Although the conditions would place a maximum on trips to and from the <br />187 property, the number of trips reasonably anticipated were reported to be approximately 50 per month. <br />188 <br />189 Engineer Studenski explained that if the permit were not approved, the dirt would have to be removed <br />190 or leveled on site. <br />191 <br />192 Patrice Carpenter, 6748 20th Av, stated that the property owner has worked to meet some of the <br />193 conditions and it has been an improvement, however, she still believes that the situation is not in the <br />194 spirit of the ordinance. The code allows for storage of earth that is to be used for grading on site and <br />195 that is not the case. The situation is a disturbance to area residents. <br />196 <br />197 Council Member Carlson moved to deny approval of the conditional use permit based on the <br />198 following findings: <br />199 <br />ak200 - zoning ordinance: city is not obligated under language for conditional use permit issuance <br />W01 since it says the city "may" grant permits; <br />202 - comprehensive plan: use is not consistent with nor the use intended for a rural area; doesn't <br />203 meet agricultural objectives; seen as a "heavy" use in an area planned for future residential <br />204 development; <br />205 - traffic/safety — Anoka County has identified safety issues but is committed to requiring they <br />206 be addressed "to the fullest extent possible" <br />207 six reasons given by Planning & Zoning Bd for denying permit. <br />208 <br />209 Council Member O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried; Council Member Reinert absent. <br />210 <br />211 UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />212 <br />213 May 7, 2007 Council Work Session Minutes <br />214 <br />215 Council Member Stoltz moved to approve the minutes. Council Member O'Donnell seconded the <br />216 motion. Motion carried; Council Member Carlson abstained; Council Member Reinert absent. <br />217 <br />218 NEW BUSINESS <br />219 <br />220 There was no New Business. <br />221 <br />S <br />5 <br />