Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION September 4, 2007 <br />APPROVED <br />1 Engineering Staff - Regarding the matter of a change to in-house engineering staff, <br />2 Community Development Director Grochala provided additional information comparing <br />3 budgets for in-house services versus by contract. Next year would be a transition year so <br />4 the figures for 2008 don't present a complete change. Some services such as plan review, <br />5 land use applications and development review could become in-house and would have a <br />6 revenue stream to the city's general fund. Staff has estimated the general engineering <br />7 costs to the city over the past three years because those costs are part of a larger <br />8 engineering budget. The average rate paid for contracted engineering staff is estimated at <br />9 about $98 per hour versus the proposed in-house budget of $53 per hour. The funding <br />10 source numbers used are very conservative. Director Grochala stated that he is basically <br />11 indifferent about the change since the city would be well served either way but there does <br />12 appear to be some potential for cost savings. He also added that TKDA has attempted to <br />13 present options to reduce the cost of their services to the city in reaction to the proposal to <br />14 go in-house. The proposal became a part of the budget when it was proposed by the <br />15 department as part of the 5 Year Plan. <br />16 <br />17 The council debated the process by which a change was brought forward and the <br />18 appropriateness of staff including the change in the proposed 2008 budget. <br />19 <br />20 There was some suggestion that discussion about a change had occurred without the <br />21 knowledge of the full council; Council Member O'Donnell requested that the record <br />22 reflect that he personally did not discuss the matter outside of official council sessions <br />23 other than to ask the city administrator one question the day previous. <br />24 <br />25 The council did not reach a decision on the engineering item. Finance Director Rolek <br />26 confirmed that the proposed budget figures could stand with either option mainly because <br />27 2008 was budgeted as a transition year. The revenue changes would have to be worked <br />28 out. <br />29 <br />30 The council will have a discussion of rebalancing the budget as all outstanding questions <br />31 are decided. <br />32 <br />33 Charter Commission - Charter Commissioners were present with a request for addition <br />34 of $5,000 to their 2008 budget. Charter Chair Cori Duffy stated that the current annual <br />35 budget of $1,500 is not adequate for this year's work level even though they've been very <br />36 cautious with the funding they have. They are working on charter amendment issues and <br />37 may require some legal expertise. <br />38 <br />39 The council concurred that the request is reasonable but confirmed that it wouldn't be an <br />40 eternal yearly addition to their budget. There may be an issue for 2007 funding and the <br />41 commission will inform the council when and if an adjustment is needed. <br />42 <br />