Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION October 23, 2007 <br />APPROVED <br />• 46 <br />47 Director Tesch noted the additional consideration of labor contracts that run from one to <br />48 three years. The city has agreements with four labor groups. There are essential and non - <br />49 essential employees — essential employees are not allowed to strike. <br />50 <br />51 Pay compression was explained by the consultant. It is a situation where pay levels are <br />52 impacted internally and can become too close and then equity can be a problem. It can <br />53 also happen when a new employee is brought in at a higher rate. <br />54 <br />55 Ms. Antonsen addressed the matter of performance based compensation. Most <br />56 commonly the use of such a system is undertaken by developing the compensation plan <br />57 with that element. A compensation wage schedule is established with an element that <br />58 allows for exceptional service rewarded by moving through the wage scale faster or vice <br />59 versa for poor performance. The other way to establish a performance based system is to <br />60 have goals outside of the standard compensation rates and a system that allows for extra <br />61 compensation; normally that system would require that funding be set aside for extra pay <br />62 if and when it becomes applicable. As far how unions would respond to a performance <br />63 based system, she believes some unions would be willing if it looks like something their <br />64 members could benefit from. <br />65 <br />66 It was confirmed that the city uses a step program for wages, with employees moving <br />• 67 <br />68 through steps on a yearly basis. New employees may start above step one based on the <br />salary of the job they are leaving and the desire to provide a raise in their new job. <br />69 <br />70 Ms. Antonsen explained the recommendation included in the report. It is based on the <br />71 contention that the city doesn't have a plan that's broken, with current job descriptions in <br />72 place and a system that keeps them reviewed on a regular basis. One thing to consider <br />73 looking at is the market comparison phase and the internal relationships between <br />74 positions. The pay philosophy is also something the City may want to review also. <br />75 <br />76 Director Tesch explained that the current system has evolved through legal and human <br />77 resource requirements as well as conforming to area markets. He provided the council <br />78 with a list of comparison cities. <br />79 <br />80 The council discussed getting proposals for the work to be done. <br />81 <br />82 Director Tesch reiterated that he is recommending the city look at internal equity as well <br />83 as development of a market philosophy that is acceptable to the council. <br />84 <br />85 A council member noted that the process in place is very familiar and something used in <br />86 other areas but it doesn't necessarily seem to be what has been followed. The process <br />87 used seems more subjective. <br />88 <br />• 89 It was noted that there was another consultant used for the administrator review process <br />90 and curiosity if that was intended. <br />