Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION November 5, 2007 <br />APPROVED <br />1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />2 MINUTES <br />3 <br />4 DATE : November 5, 2007 <br />5 TIME STARTED : 5:35 P.M. <br />6 TIME ENDED : 9:35 P.M. <br />7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council member Carlson, Reinert, O'Donnell, <br />8 Stoltz, and Mayor Bergeson <br />9 MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 Staff Members Present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Finance Director, Al Rolek; <br />13 City Engineer, Jim Studenski; Community Development Director, Michael Grochala; <br />14 Director of Administration, Dan Tesch; Economic Development Coordinator, Mary Alice <br />15 Divine; Public Service Director, Rick DeGardner; City Clerk, Julie Bartell <br />16 <br />17 Hartford Group — Economic Development Coordinator Divine introduced Frank Janes <br />18 and Patrick Sarver of the Hartford Group. They will discuss a proposal for a senior <br />19 housing project for the Legacy at Woods Edge Project. Their proposal would require <br />20 some adjustments to the original master plan and they want to discuss them with the <br />21 council. An amendment to that land use plan would be required. Graphics were <br />22 distributed. <br />23 <br />24 Mr. Janes noted that they have been working with staff on elements of the Legacy at <br />25 Woods Edge project that they believe could move forward. He remarked that the current <br />26 housing market makes this a challenging time. They are proposing a couple of projects <br />27 they think can move forward — a senior project and a multifamily project. He noted that <br />28 he would review the overall project to bring the council up to date. The graphics <br />29 reviewed were master plan site layout, southwest development conceptual layout and <br />30 conceptual layout site plan. <br />31 <br />32 Mr, Janes noted that original plans had the senior site in a certain area and they are <br />33 proposing to move it adjacent to the park. They are trying to get a viable senior project <br />34 and the original location would be problematic with its commercial element in today's <br />35 market. Closer to the park would be preferable. They propose a building with a north <br />36 side portion with four stories, a middle portion with a two story center concept and then a <br />37 south portion tapering down to three stories, similar to a project in Maplewood. They are <br />38 looking at 140-160 units comprised of independent senior housing units (age restricted <br />39 senior apartment with no services — 40 units) along with the addition of independent <br />40 senior units with some limited services. Another component would be assisted living and <br />41 some "care suites". This would provide a continuum of care similar to other projects they <br />42 have done. There would be a combination of 1-2 bedroom units in the independent, and <br />43 the independent and assisted with services would be mostly 1 bedroom. Care suites <br />44 would be more segregated to provide for more care. Community space is included — card <br />45 rooms, salon, movie room, often a chapel, etc. Underground parking is included for <br />