Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 5, 2008 <br />APPROVED <br />•130 The council indicated that staff should work with the Lions on viability and location. There was <br />131 a consensus of support for the concept and an indication that more conversation is certainly <br />132 warranted. <br />133 Lino Lakes Lion Dick Schumacher joined the discussion. The Lions are very interested in <br />134 community awareness and they would also like to see some recognition of the Lions on the signs <br />135 themselves. <br />136 Administrator Heitke will assign staff to contact Mr. Benjamin to work further on the concept. <br />137 <br />138 Animal Ordinance - Community Development Director Grochala reported that the council has <br />139 approved first reading of this proposed ordinance that combines certain sections of the code and <br />140 presents a more comprehensive and up to date animal regulation code. A public meeting <br />141 sponsored by the Lino Lakes Police Department was held on April 8, 2008; comments received <br />142 at that meeting as well as direct communications to City Hall have been included in the staff <br />143 report. Staff has made a few changes to the ordinance since the council saw it at first reading, <br />144 mainly based on comments received, including the definition of "at large", a modification to the <br />145 right of entry language to require a search warrant, and some minor notification requirements as <br />146 well as an exception relative to hunting dogs. The largest issue seems to be the matter of <br />147 restraint on premises. Some language has been added to the ordinance to clarify that but the <br />148 language continues to require certain restraint that does not include voice control. <br />149 A council member suggested that the city has grown but it is still quite roomy and the restraint <br />10150 issues seem to be about animals after each other. Would some moderation such as application to <br />151 only smaller lots be feasible? <br />152 Public Safety Director Pecchia noted that the ordinance language that is being recommended is <br />153 for mitigation and prevention — to prevent injuries. <br />154 Community Development Director Grochala suggested that it would be difficult for the police <br />155 department to enforce if the regulations are tied to something like lot size. <br />156 In response to a question about possibly certifying animals that can be voice controlled, the <br />157 police chief responded that it wouldn't be reasonable. If the council were to decide to allow <br />158 voice control, the department would intend to keep a record and report on occurrences. <br />159 The council directed staff to add language allowing voice control but clarified that voice control <br />160 would mean that a responsible party would have to be present and it would not apply to a dog <br />161 running loose. Hunting provisions allow for voice control currently. <br />162 The ordinance, as amended, will be presented to the council for second reading and adoption. <br />163 <br />164 Review of May 12 Regular Council Meeting Agenda — There were no changes (other than <br />165 adding an item on Blue Heron Days to the consent agenda) to the council agenda. <br />166 Items discussed: <br />167 Election Precinct Boundary Change - Jean Viger, Deputy City Clerk, reviewed a proposal to <br />68 change voter precinct borders affecting Precincts 6 and 7. A change in state law allows the <br />169 proposed change which will in turn make polling places more manageable by more evenly <br />