Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION 2 August 18, 2008 <br />APPROVED <br />1 There have been certain outside funding requests received and Mr. Rolek noted that none <br />2 of them have been included in the proposed budget. The Charter Commission has <br />3 submitted a request for additional funds. The city also received requests from Alexandra <br />4 House, Forest Lake Youth Services Bureau, Metro Cities and Anoka County Mediation <br />5 Services. <br />6 <br />7 Areas of reduction were noted as follows: Elections (2009 is a local election year, <br />8 requiring less funding), capital outlay, and prosecution services (due to service contract <br />9 change). <br />10 <br />11 Mr. Rolek's review of the specific budget divisions included the following: <br />12 <br />13 Capital Program — Public Services equipment replacement program includes some new <br />14 squad cars, contribution for fire department equipment, a dump truck, pick-up trucks, a <br />15 loader and some smaller equipment. Office equipment replacement has been scaled back <br />16 also. Trail extensions have been taken out completely. <br />17 <br />18 Contingency — has been scaled back to $40,000 (from $50,000 last year), a very thin <br />19 margin. <br />20 <br />21 Community Development and Engineering — includes funding for conclusion of the <br />22 comprehensive plan activities, including ordinance review costs. (The council requested <br />23 a comprehensive plan update in September, before board review). Engineering has been <br />24 scaled back due to less activity and the services themselves would remain outsourced. <br />25 The possibility of bringing engineering services in-house is something that will be looked <br />26 at more comprehensively within the five-year plan. When asked about the lower activity <br />27 level impact on staff, it was explained that there is a minimal change in staff work <br />28 because the day to day operations (resident issues, dealing with MnDOT, day to day <br />29 support) don't really slow down much because development related costs are handled <br />30 through escrows and other budgets. Storm damage is driving permit activities this year <br />31 but that does not produce as much cross departmental fee revenue as new homes. Staff <br />32 will take a look at the $100 fee for a repair permit to make sure it adequately reflects the <br />33 city's costs. Also noted was an increase in the funding for replacement of boulevard <br />34 trees. <br />35 <br />36 Police Department — no new positions will be added as indicated in the five year plan. <br />37 The department has cut back in the area of supplies, other services and capital. The <br />38 department feels they are at a minimum level without impacting the service level. <br />39 <br />40 Fire Department — the budget comes from the steering group so Administrator Heitke <br />41 reviewed. The twenty-five percent overall increase in costs over the last three years can <br />42 be attributed to making the budget more accurate — it was traditionally underfunded for <br />43 operations. Also this year, in consideration of the need to prioritize inspection activities, <br />44 the budget includes a portion of the cost of an additional fire inspector position. The <br />45 position would actually be partially grant funded for five years and the new fire chief <br />