My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/22/2008 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2008
>
09/22/2008 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2015 12:52:09 PM
Creation date
2/13/2015 11:46:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
09/22/2008
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br />• <br />1 <br />DATE <br />TIME STARTED <br />TIME ENDED <br />MEMBERS PRESENT <br />MEMBERS ABSENT <br />APPROVED <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />MINUTES <br />: September 22, 2008 <br />. 5:31 p.m. <br />: (with recess) 7:40 p.m. <br />: Councilmember Gallup, O'Donnell, <br />Stoltz, Reinert and Mayor Bergeson <br />: None <br />Staff members present: Director of Administration, Dan Tesch; City Engineer, Jim <br />Studenski; City Planner, Paul Bengtson; Economic Development Director, Mary Alice <br />Divine; City Clerk, Julie Bartell <br />The Council agreed to meet on September 29, at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />REVIEW REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS <br />The following items were discussed. <br />Item 6A — Plan Extensions of Time — Planner Bengtson explained that the council is <br />being requested to consider a seven part item granting extensions to certain development <br />projects. The city has seven plats that have not moved forward in the process, in most <br />part the result of the current economic slow down that has affected development. Staff <br />has attached conditions to the extensions as appropriate. <br />Item 8A — Initiate investigation of open meeting law violation allegations — A council <br />member questioned why the city attorney was not present. It was clarified that the city <br />attorney will be present when this matter is discussed at the council meeting. <br />One council member suggested that the selection of counsel should be made by the one <br />council member who is not named in the allegation. That would be Council Member <br />O'Donnell. In that case, there could be no implication of improper selection. <br />There was a question about how this type of situation (open meeting violation) is <br />typically handled; it would have been preferable to have an attorney present at this <br />meeting to answer that question. There was discussion about whether there should be any <br />limitation on what the investigation covers and a suggestion that it should look at the full <br />scope of how many legal meetings have occurred. <br />The council planned to further discuss the matter with the city attorney at the council <br />meeting following this work session. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.