Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION -2- December 1, 2008 <br />APPROVED <br />044 moderate income housing. The Met Council has projections of growth (sewer serviced) and <br />5 affordable units are allocated across the metro area based on those factors. From that point of <br />46 allocation, there are factors for addition or deduction such as low wage job proximity, affordable <br />47 housing stock, transit service, etc. <br />48 The council reviewed a map showing distribution of affordable housing units metro wide (with <br />49 an attached summary table). Staff pointed out that the map indicates that Lino Lakes has a need <br />50 for 1,051 units adjusted to 560. The proposed Plan estimates a total of 4,150 added housing <br />51 units for Lino Lakes. <br />52 <br />53 A council member suggested that the previous Plan didn't include the same type of projections <br />54 and the 32% high density over the next ten years is not what Lino Lakes needs or wants. There <br />55 are already problems being seen with the addition of the housing in the Town Center area. The <br />56 council member suggests that the council's discussion on the Plan shouldn't be about "how" the <br />57 city does things but first "if' the city should do them. <br />58 The council committed to having as many discussions as necessary to bring together the Plan. A <br />59 joint meeting with the Comp Plan Advisory Panel will be scheduled for January 21, 6:30 p.m. at <br />60 City Hall. <br />61 The council then discussed a breakdown of the 4,150 projected units (platted vs. unplatted) and <br />62 locations (green field vs. in -fill). <br />63 When a council member asked staff what has happened to other cities that have not followed the <br />•64 Met Council's guidelines, Ms. Schlichting recalled that the City of Lake Elmo did not prevail in <br />65 their court case involving a fight against sewered development. She added that much of what the <br />66 Met Council is about is related to capital infrastructure development in their effort to plan for the <br />67 whole area. <br />68 A council member noted that the council's Plan review to this point has been mainly to give <br />69 general feedback without getting to specifics that can move the review along. There was general <br />70 concensus that the council must move toward some results and the ultimate responsibility in that <br />71 area lies with the council and not staff. <br />72 <br />73 The council agreed to meet at a special work session to be held after the upcoming regular <br />74 council meeting on December 8 to continue the Plan review. <br />75 <br />76 2. Request to Amend Animal Ordinance - Public Safety Director Pecchia reported. <br />77 Jeremy and Jamie Gudmundson, 992 Kelly St, were present; the Gudmundson's have requested <br />78 that the council amend the city's current animal control regulations to allow them to keep their <br />79 two dogs and sometimes a third fostered dog on their property (that does not meet the one acre <br />80 requirement for a private kennel). <br />81 <br />82 Chief Pecchia reported that the Police Department is fine with the current regulations and their <br />83 official recommendation is no change. It is the council's prerogative to change the regulations, <br />84 however. If a change is eminent, from an enforcement standpoint, he'd recommend the rules be <br />85 changed overall to allow three dogs without a kennel license, avoiding the foster dog situation <br />.86 which would be difficult to verify. He pledged to follow the direction of the council and make it <br />87 work. <br />