My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-27-2015 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2015
>
04-27-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2015 12:46:00 PM
Creation date
4/28/2015 12:43:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/27/2015
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anoka County City of Lino Lakes <br />county levels. The Minnesota Department of Revenue also uses these same techniques to <br />test for equity between counties. The primary statistics used are: <br />Median Ratio: This is a measure of central tendency that is the midpoint of a group of sales <br />ratios when arrayed from low to high. The median is a useful statistic as it is not affected <br />by extreme ratios. <br />Aggregate Ratio: This is the total market value of all sale properties divided by the total <br />sale prices. It, along with the mean ratio, gives an idea of our assessment level. Within <br />the city, we constantly try to achieve an aggregate and mean ratio of 94% to 95% to <br />give us a margin to account for a fluctuating market and still maintain ratios within state <br />mandated guidelines. Also referred to as the Weighted Mean. <br />Mean Ratio: The mean is the average ratio. We use this ratio not only to watch our <br />assessment level, but also to analyze property values by development, type of dwelling <br />and value range. These studies enable us to track market trends in neighborhoods, <br />popular housing types and classes of property. <br />Coefficient of Dispersion (COD): The COD measures the accuracy of the assessment. It <br />is possible to have a median ratio of 93% with 300 sales, two ratios at 93%, 149 at 80% <br />and 149 at 103%. Although this is an excellent median ratio, there is obviously a great <br />inequality in the assessment. The COD indicates the spread of the ratios from the mean <br />or median ratio. <br />The goal of a good assessment is a COD of 10 to 20. A COD under 10 is considered <br />excellent and anything over 20 will mean an assessment review by the Department of <br />Revenue. <br />Price Related Differential (PRD): This statistic measures the equality between the <br />assessments of high and low valued property. A PRD over 100 indicates a regressive <br />assessment, or the lower valued properties are assessed at a greater degree than the <br />higher. A PRD of less than 100 indicates a progressive assessment or the opposite. A <br />perfect PRD of 100 means that both higher and lower valued properties are assessed <br />exactly equal. <br />Current Sales Study Statistics <br />The following statistics are based upon ratios calculated using 2015 pay 2016 market values <br />and October 2013 thru September 2014 sales. These are the ratios that our office uses for <br />countywide equalization, checking assessment accuracy, and predicting trends in the <br />market. <br />2015 Anoka County <br />Residential Sales Ratio <br />Statistics <br />Median Ratio 93.22 <br />Coefficient of Dispersion on Median 7.46 <br />Price Related Differential 1.01 <br />Anoka County Ratio Study —2015 Assessment <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.