Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />begin the extension to the north to accommodate that and provide impetus for further <br />commercial development. The city completed a feasibility study to determine costs. The cost <br />is $895,000 to complete Phase 1 of the extension and bring public utilities to the site. This <br />cost would be split by the two benefitting property owners. One of the property owners does <br />not want to pay these assessments and is challenging the assessment. The council will have to <br />determine if it wants to move forward. <br /> <br />Ms. Schwartz noted that the city performed an Alternative Urban Areawide Review, which <br />includes most of the east side of the city. Lino Lakes was also the first city to do a resource <br />management plan with the watershed district citywide. This environmental review will <br />streamline approvals and costs for developers, as well as use best environmental management <br />practices. <br /> <br />b. Charter Commission Referendum Updates <br />Ms. Divine explained that the city has a charter commission. Members are appointed by a <br />district judge. The commission’s job is to frame and amend the city charter. The commission <br />is proposing amendments to the charter, including a tax cap. <br /> <br />Mr .Kassner asked what the purpose of the charter commission. Ms. Divine reviewed the <br />history of the charter and the impetus for it being established. Its main purpose was to protect <br />citizens from being assessed for roads and utilities to serve new development. However, <br />Section 8 of the charter has been an issue for years because it makes it difficult for the city to <br />reconstruct local roads. Some roads in Lino Lakes are beyond their useful life and need to be <br />reconstructed. According to the charter, if the city is going to assess benefitting property <br />owners for any of the costs of reconstruction, the question must go to referendum. In the past <br />30 years, only one referendum has passed. City officials are growing increasingly concerned <br />that older roads cannot be reconstructed when they need to be, the city cannot plan a <br />reasonable reconstruction schedule, and the city could face very high costs eventually as the <br />problems continue to grow. She noted the city council is discussing placing a ballot question <br />to amend the charter to make it easier for the city to reconstruct roads. <br /> <br />Mr. Stranik noted that most other cities operate under state law, which allows the city to <br />build roads and assess a fair amount to benefitting property owners. The city charter <br />overrides state law. After further discussion, Ms. Divine noted that the charter language is <br />complex, ambiguous and confusing and a lot of misinformation has been disseminated over <br />time. <br /> <br />c. Industrial Area Review <br />Ms. Divine notified EDAC that the March meeting would be a joint EDAC/P&Z meeting to <br />discuss changes to the city’s industrial zoning ordinances. Staff and a consultant have been <br />reviewing them and will recommend changes that have potential consequences to future <br />development of the industrial areas of the city. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />