Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />The major access is on Hodgson approximately 1,000 sq. ft. from Cty. J. Mr. Tucci explained the <br />interim access points for this project with future development access points. Oppidan has met <br />with the county to work out access issues. <br /> <br />He also explained how they addressed neighborhood concerns with creating a 6-foot berm with a <br />6-foot fence between the store and the residences. The nearest point between a residence and the <br />store is 40 feet. The back of the store will be lit with wall packs rather than poles. Oppidan has <br />told the operators that deliveries may not start until 7 a.m. and will have an end time by 11 p.m. <br />There are 300 stalls, or 5 per 1,000 sq. ft., per city ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Tucci discussed the trade study that shows mainly an east-west market. The numbers are <br />strong. This store is the same size as the Festival in Hugo. Ms. Divine noted that size was an <br />issue with the City Council. Oppidan is talking to several operators, because this store is small <br />for a Cub. <br /> <br />Mr. Tucci said this $8 million project will need TIF assistance because of the large cost of road <br />and utilities improvements that benefit the entire quadrant. Ms. Divine noted that TIF has never <br />been allowed on Greenfield sites for retail in the past, but the legislature has provided a one-year <br />opportunity to TIF retail to spur development. This legislation would have to be extended to be <br />able to use for this project. Ms. Divine gave a short explanation of how TIF works. <br /> <br />Mr. Combs questioned is this the right time to do this project? Ms. Divine said except for the <br />window of opportunity with the TIF legislation, this project would not happen for many years <br />because of the high cost of bringing in road and utility improvements. Mr. Tucci said without <br />assistance, Oppidan could not absorb $1.5-2 million in improvement costs. Mr. Tucci stated a <br />neighborhood meeting will be held soon and their goal is to try to mitigate their concerns. Ms. <br />Keller noted that the past proposals have met considerable resistance. <br /> <br />Mr. Tucci stated that a grocer or a drug store are about the only drivers for this quadrant. <br />Pharmacies and grocers don’t like to be near each other because they compete. It’s not on a <br />highway, so regional users like Menards etc. wouldn’t want this site. Ms. Divine noted that the <br />draft Comp Plan designates this area for mixed use, which recognizes its neighborhood character <br />and will likely partly develop as housing. <br /> <br />After Mr. Tucci left the meeting Mr. Stranik asked members their opinions on the grocer <br />proposal. Ms. Keller and Ms. Schwartz both agreed it was necessary to take the opportunity to <br />start redevelopment of the area, otherwise the area will become more blighted. Mr. Salzman <br />questioned whether it could succeed at that location, and how the improvements will impact <br />taxpayers. Ms. Divine stated that TIF would provide assistance, only impacts the taxpayers in <br />that for a period of time, they don’t benefit from the new taxes generated. She added that the user <br />will likely be required to pay its share of the improvements. Mr. Combs stated that since the <br />grocers have done their studies, he believes it is a good site. His concern is how to sell this to the <br />residents and the council, since this may not be an opportunity the city can’t afford to pass up. <br />Mr. Masonick said cities must find ways to raise revenue through new tax base. What does the <br />council want to see there? Mr. Johnson said it’s the way to get utilities to the area and to provide <br />a livable community with neighborhood access to conveniences. Mr. Stranik agreed, but