Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />Masonic said that in Roseville there was an issue about forcing people to hook up and pay, so the <br />city paid the cost through bonds. <br /> <br />EDAC was asked to look at whether the city should consider ways to extend the life of non- <br />conforming uses so that vacant, non-conforming buildings can be resold and not further <br />deteriorate. Or should EDAC be looking for ways to find solutions to enable redevelopment? <br />Does the city charter make it more difficult to extend utilities, and does the charter need to be <br />amended? Discussion of city charter ensued. Ms. Divine suggested that Mr. Grochala attend an <br />EDAC meeting to explain the charter in more detail at a future meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Corson noted that long-term approach is better. Mr. Johnson noted that some of these Lake <br />Drive sites have problems to enable development, including wetlands and very wide right-of- <br />ways. Ms. Keller said there’s nothing likely to happen soon, so she understands it would be <br />better to have somebody in to get it fixed up, but once somebody gets in, they might be there a <br />very long time. She said while it might be painful in the short term, long term redevelopment <br />would be better. Mr. Masonic said Lino Lakes has wrestled with whether it wants development <br />or not, and the charter was formed to make it more difficult to develop. He feels strongly the city <br />can’t trample on homeowner’s feet. Properties should be able to be used if it doesn’t affect others <br />personal rights. He asked what other options are available to solve these kinds of problems. <br /> <br />Ms. Divine noted that there are a variety of ways cities clean up properties to entice a developer, <br />including purchasing them, but that requires financial commitment. Funding can be available to <br />cities through EDA levies, commitments to revolving loan programs, and potential new <br />grants/loans programs to stimulate the economy. Currently there is a state loan program to <br />purchase blighted property, but the program is yet unfunded. <br /> <br />Members agreed there is an issue, but felt that there was no action that EDAC needed to take at <br />this time. <br /> <br />Members discussed extending an invitation to a couple of representatives of the charter <br />commission for a future meeting. <br /> <br />JOBS BILL <br />Ms. Divine informed EDAC of the recent legislative action, including a compact development <br />district. In this district you don’t have to meet the all the substandard criteria of redevelopment <br />districts, but you need to build 3 times the square footage of what is currently within the district. <br />You need a development prospect and the district can only be created within the next two years. <br /> <br />Another new district is that a 10-year economic development district can be created for any use, <br />residential, commercial or industrial. It must be created within the next year. This district offers <br />some possibility for east side improvements, using any new development that occurs. She noted <br />that staff is working to get stakeholders on the east side together to discuss the potential. <br /> <br />Angel tax credits are now available for small businesses, especially technology business, where <br />investors in the business can now receive tax credits. <br />