My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/09/2004 EDAC Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Economic Development Advisory Committee
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
09/09/2004 EDAC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 3:40:58 PM
Creation date
5/27/2015 9:14:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EDAC
EDAC Document Type
EDAC Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/2004
EDAC Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Steinman explained the details of the financial package to the committee. The sale of <br />the city land is $2.2 million as an unrestricted source of funds. The developer will <br />purchase the Tagg property and the city land likely in December. When the land is sold, <br />the Village fund will be paid off, and then the project will make an internal loan to the <br />developer, and that loan will be paid off by TIF. There is a small profit in the land sale. <br /> <br />Mr. Steinman said the Met Council grant decision is possibly within the next month or <br />so. Ms. Divine said we’d know soon if we are not going to get the grant. The gap is more <br />comfortable with the grant. This project is ready to go, which is what the Met Council <br />wants. You don’t get all the way to that point without having alternatives to completing <br />the project. The Taggs have stated that they are not interested in continuing this project <br />longer than their purchase agreement deadline in December. <br /> <br />Mr. Steinman said a worse case scenario is 16 years of TIF. He explained that the upfront <br />$1.7 million (without the grant) would be distributed when buildings are demolished and <br />the preliminary plat is approved, likely in June 2005. The money goes into escrow until <br />the developers pull a building permit on the townhome project. The value in the ground is <br />necessary to ensure payback of the upfront TIF. By this time the developer has $8 million <br />in land costs, and has graded the property. An internal loan of $1 million note to the <br />developer is pay-as-you-go. <br /> <br />The site improvements will be all be done at once. Mr. Helgemoe asked about the <br />strength of the developer. Mr. Steinman said they have a banking relationship; the bank is <br />really the developer. Springsted has done due diligence on this developer, and they have a <br />track record with successful performance. If they can secure financing, they have <br />demonstrated ability. Mr. Helgemoe said some banks will take greater risks. Ms. Divine <br />stated the townhomes are the least speculative and are in the TIF district. <br /> <br />Mr. Steinman said distribution of TIF funds will go first to the debt service on the TIF <br />bonds. The remainder will be distributed on parity between the $1.7 million that is owed <br />to the city and $1 million that is owed on the development note. <br /> <br />Mr. Gorowsky stated a significant joint effort has occurred to arrive at a package that is <br />the best scenario. This is not just the developer saying it’s what they need to have. This <br />was a negotiated tentative conclusion that accomplishes both side’s goals. It would be <br />inappropriate for EDAC to discuss carving it back. <br /> <br />Mr. Steinman said the developer’s cost is approximately $17 million, with $5.5 million in <br />assistance. <br /> <br />Mr. Vacha asked about the amount of tax base the city will get outside the TIF district. <br />About half the value is generated outside the TIF district. The whole development would <br />generate about $554,000 in city share of taxes, so about ½ of that is in non-TIF portion. <br /> <br />Ms. Divine stated that if the entire project were in the TIF district, the pay-off would be 8 <br />years. Mr. Steinman said it is phenomenal that this project is getting paid off in 16 years <br /> 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.