2014-001 Council Resolution - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

d. The plight of the landowner shall be due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The Shoreland Overlay District ordinance should have been amended when the Zoning Ordinance was amended in 2012 to reflect setback consistency with the underlying zoning district. e. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance shall not alter the essential character of the locality. The construction of a single family home in a residential neighborhood is consistent with the essential character of the locality. The R-2 Two Family District allows for a 25 foot front setback. f. A variance shall not be granted for any use that is not allowed under the ordinance for property in the zoning district where the subject site is located. Single family homes are permitted uses in the R-2, Two Family zoning district. g. In accordance with MN Stat. 462.357, Subp. 6, variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in MN Stat. 216C.06, Subd. 14, when in harmony with the zoning ordinance Not applicable. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby approves a variance from the Shoreland Overlay District for Marshan Meadows Second Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Variance Resolution, Final Plat and Development Contract shall be recorded with Anoka County. 2. A building permit for construction of a single family home shall be submitted and approved by the City. 3. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District for review and approval. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 2 7 day of Jan , 2014. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member Stoesz and was duly seconded by Council Member Kusterman and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Stoesz, Kusterman, Rafferty, Roeser, Reinert The following voted against same: none 2