Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF ORIGINATOR: <br />CC MEETING DATE: <br />TOPIC: <br />BACKGROUND <br />AGENDA ITEM 6.A. <br />Paul Bengtson <br />October 11, 2010 <br />Second Reading of Ordinance Number 11-10 — <br />Amending Section 3 of the Zoning Ordinance to <br />revise the permit requirements for swimming pools <br />and the construction requirements for fences and <br />walls. <br />The city's Building Official has identified a couple of minor changes that should be <br />made to the Zoning Ordinance to better reflect the Building Code and Property <br />Maintenance Codes. <br />First, the Swimming Pool section requirement for permit does not match the building <br />code. It currently requires a permit for a pool with a 5,000 gallon capacity OR depth <br />potential of 30 inches. The Building Code only requires a permit if both thresholds are <br />met, staff is proposing the following change to the text within Section 3.Subdivision <br />4.D.3.a.1: <br />1) A building permit shall be required for any swimming pool with a <br />capacity of over five thousand (5,000) gallons or -and with a depth <br />potential of thirty (30") inches. <br />Next, the Zoning Ordinance currently requires all fences and walls to be 10% open. <br />This is believed to have been added to the ordinance in an attempt to inform residents <br />of potential property maintenance (airflow) and building code (wind loads) issues. <br />Neither the Building Code, nor the city's property maintenance codes have any <br />opening requirements for fences anymore. The current issue with the opening <br />requirement is that residents cannot purchase preassembled solid six foot fence <br />panels sold in home improvement stores. They are forced to choose alternating board <br />panels, or panels with lattice sections. This eliminates some of the privacy that these <br />fences offer. <br />Additionally, at the September 8, 2010 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Board <br />recommended that the ordinance's current prohibition of the use of 'used materials' be <br />removed to allow the re -use of materials so long as the wall is constructed in a <br />professional and substantial manner as required earlier in the same paragraph of the <br />ordinance. Staff agrees that the reuse of materials is important to allow, but would the <br />Building Official would like to still include some sort of limitation on the materials used <br />for fence construction. As such, staff is including a revised sentence about materials <br />allowed. <br />