My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
Ordinance 17-99
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Ordinances
>
1999
>
Ordinance 17-99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2015 11:13:36 AM
Creation date
7/20/2015 11:03:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Ordinances
Meeting Date
02/14/2000
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Russell and Elizabeth Melton <br />2150 Otter Lake Drive <br />White Bear Lake, MN 55110 <br />(651) 407-9283 <br />August 18, 1999 <br />Members of the City Council <br />Honorable Mayor Sullivan <br />Ladies and Gentlemen: <br />We have asked you to partially vacate a drainage easement to accommodate a <br />hockey rink on our property. By doing so, you will not be sanctioning any <br />reduction in compensatory storage for drainage water on Oak Brook <br />Peninsula. <br />WHAT WE HAVE DONE TO THE PROPERTY THAT COULD HAVE AFFECTED THE <br />EASEMENT: <br />We have done nothing to reduce the amount of water that can be stored on <br />the easement. Since we built our house in 1997, we have made two changes <br />which could arguably affect the storage capacity of the easement: <br />1) We enlarged the pond that was on the property; and <br />2) We built a hockey rink. <br />The first change increased the capacity for storage of water. The second has <br />had no effect on water storage. <br />As part of landscaping our yard, we enlarged the pond on our property. The <br />City, the DNR and the Rice Creek Watershed District were all notified about <br />this. They sent inspectors and worked with Russell to approve the changes to <br />the pond. The pond was dug specifically to prevent sediment running into <br />the wetlands to the east of the property. The part closest to the street was <br />dug to a 3' level. The next area was dug to 2' and the narrow channel closest <br />to the wetlands was dug to 1&1/2'. At first, we apparently dug too close to <br />the wetlands, but that area was restored and the authorities had no further <br />issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.