My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2003-151 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2003
>
2003-151 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2015 11:52:49 AM
Creation date
7/29/2015 11:06:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
09/13/2003
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TKDA <br />illy ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza <br />444 Cedar Street <br />Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 <br />(651) 292-4400 <br />(651) 292-0083 Fax <br />www.tkda.com <br />To: James E. Studenski, P.E. Reference: JADT Commercial Site <br />Copies To: City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />Comm. No. 12701-002 <br />From: Scott A. Brink Routing: <br />Date: August 7, 2003 <br />Review correspondence for this proposed development was previously provided in memorandums to the City <br />dated May 6, 2003, April 9, 2003, and February 28, 2003. The following documents have been provided for <br />this review: <br />• Architectural Plans prepared by KKE Architects and dated July 14, 2003 (Site Plan, Planting Plan, <br />Landscape Details, Lighting Plan, Building Floor Plans, and Exterior Building Profiles). <br />• • Preliminary Plans prepared by Ryan Engineering, dated July 14, 2003 (Preliminary Plat, Preliminary <br />Site Plan, Preliminary Grading Plan, and Preliminary Utility Plan). <br />The proposed development plans have generally been previously reviewed as part of a larger development <br />plan. Much of the required infrastructure is already in place. The plans presented herein for review (Lots 2 <br />and 3) generally fall within the bounds of previous reviews. The following additional comments are <br />provided based upon the information received: <br />1. Previous review memorandums and correspondence have responded to ponding and drainage design <br />for the site. Revised stormwater computations reflecting the proposed stormwater pond design as <br />shown per the plans received must be provided. <br />2. Pond emergency overflow -locations and elevations must be provided on the plan. In addition, the <br />grading plan should also be reviewed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation since <br />stormwater is entering the wetland that borders I -35W. Revised storm water calculations must <br />demonstrate that the 100 -year flood elevation of the existing wetland will not change. <br />3. The Rice Creek Watershed District must also review and approve the revised stormwater revisions. <br />4. It is recommended that a fire hydrant be added at or near the property line between Lots 1 and 2. The <br />number and location of hydrants shall be subject to review and approval of the City Fire Chief. <br />An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.